Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16891 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2003 07:28:02 -0000 Received: from netmail02.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.221) by mailstore with SMTP; 29 Jan 2003 07:28:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 19746 invoked by uid 10001); 29 Jan 2003 07:28:02 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by netmail02.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 29 Jan 2003 07:28:01 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.12) id 18dmZb-0000VO-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 07:23:51 +0000 Received: from [194.73.73.116] (helo=lutetium.btinternet.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18dmZb-0000VF-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 07:23:51 +0000 Received: from host213-1-128-24.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([213.1.128.24] helo=presario-1920) by lutetium.btinternet.com with smtp (Exim 3.22 #16) id 18dmZZ-0003yr-00; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 07:23:50 +0000 From: "John W Gould" To: "Rsgb_Lf_Group@Blacksheep.Org" Cc: "HF. Chairman List Member" , "Vk4du@Gmdss. Com. Au" Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 07:24:20 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Importance: Normal Subject: LF: IARU Region 1 position on 500kHz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=6.0tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REALversion=2.43 X-Spam-Level: * X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false My apologies for not bringing to this group's attention before the outcome of a discussion of the RSGB paper on 500kHz, at the San Marino Region 1 Conference. AMRAD have usefully summarised the position with the following in their Jan-Feb 2003 Newsletter, which I quote with their agreement: "G3PSM chaired a working group of ON7ZV, PA0SHY, PA0AWN, ZL2AMJ and G4OUT. The result was the adoption of Recommendation REC/02/SMC4.11, as follows: A Working Group would be formed to investigate the possibility of a frequency allocation of approximately 10kHz between 470-490kHz to investigate propagation and the use of new communication technologies. A progress report should be circulated to the secretaries of Region 2 and Region 3 for information." I would add to that statement a comment to me from Colin, G3PSM on his return that we should be looking in a post-WRC2003 timeframe to come back with proposals in relation to this part of the spectrum, thus this is a long-term issue. As IARU Region 1 LF Coordinator I have assumed some responsibility for forming a "500kHz Working Group" and have approached a few people to lead such a group. This has been without success, so I put the question to the LF Group - Can I have volunteers please to work in a group, using e-mail and a dedicated website, to carry out the task detailed by the above IARU Region 1 recommendation. Once a group has been formed it can choose its chairperson. I would like to see an international membership of the Group, hence the need to conduct business over the Internet. Meeting together would be expensive and probably difficult to arrange. Volunteers should e-mail me directly rather than post to the reflector. This e-mail has been copied to Colin, G3PSM and also Glenn, VK4DU (for Region 3). 73 John, G3WKL g3wkl@btinternet.com