Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3580 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2003 18:35:00 -0000 Received: from netmail02.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.221) by mailstore with SMTP; 8 Jan 2003 18:35:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 12861 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2003 18:34:32 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by netmail02.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 8 Jan 2003 18:34:31 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.12) id 18WKQM-0001ep-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2003 17:55:30 +0000 Received: from [193.82.59.20] (helo=post.omnieng.co.uk) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18WKQC-0001dD-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2003 17:55:24 +0000 Received: from mta06-svc.ntlworld.com ([62.253.162.46]) by post.omnieng.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18WJXg-0003Dn-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2003 16:59:00 +0000 Received: from default ([62.253.50.48]) by mta06-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with SMTP id <20030108165131.MBHP20174.mta06-svc.ntlworld.com@default> for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2003 16:51:31 +0000 Message-ID: <00d201c2b736$1bdbc5a0$b930fd3e@default> From: "Tracey Gardner" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <29BDD4F529FCD311B631009027357C4E04D6A01C@btss103a.swh.sk> Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 16:50:50 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: LFA 520 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=6.0tests=REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT_OEversion=2.43 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Rich John Wilson did a comparison test in the Nov 2001 Short Wave Magazine between the RF Systems 520 and the Wellbrook Communications LFL1010 VLF loop antenna and the 520 was well beaten by the 1010 . http://www.wellbrook.uk.com/LFL1010.html The SWM review of the 520/1010 and John's savage comments about the 520 can be found here! :-) http://www.wellbrook.uk.com/reviews/SWM2001Nov.html 73s Tracey > > Anybody have experiences with receiving antenna LFA 520 from RF SYSTEMS ? > > Rich OM2TW >