Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20634 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2003 16:16:35 -0000 Received: from marstons.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.223) by mailstore with SMTP; 29 Jan 2003 16:16:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 13357 invoked by uid 10001); 29 Jan 2003 16:16:31 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by marstons.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 29 Jan 2003 16:16:31 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.12) id 18duoK-00027b-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 16:11:36 +0000 Received: from [206.49.67.1] (helo=mxb.etecsa.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18duoH-00027S-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 16:11:34 +0000 Received: (from daemon@localhost) by mxb.etecsa.net (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id LAA07390; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 11:11:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from ppp-inforhc.pppn.etecsa.cu(10.10.0.2), claiming to be "user" via SMTP by mxb.etecsa.net, id smtpdAAA3ga4uo; Wed Jan 29 11:11:23 2003 Message-ID: <007401c2c7a8$c7a4e1a0$02000a0a@user> From: "Prof. Arnaldo Coro Antich" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Cc: "John W Gould" References: Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 09:27:20 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: Re: IARU Region 1 position on 500kHz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=6.0tests=DEAR_SOMEBODY,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT_OEversion=2.43 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Dear John: We have heard about similar interests related to an allocation around 500 kHz. But I must advise that many Third World nations are still using that segment of the spectrum for maritime communications. Recent efforts to try to obtain a 600 meters band assignment by amateurs in neighboring countries came to a standstill when their telecommunications administrations replied that this was not possible because the segment was still in use for maritime communications. It would be very interesting and useful to have access to any documentation that Region I and Region III IARU coordinators may have, in order to approach our telecommunications administration regarding the preparations for the upcoming WARC 2003 to take place in Geneva later this year. I believe that one solid argument backing the request would be the succesful use of the 136 kiloHertz band by amateurs in many different countries, and along that line, I would like to request information regarding the number of countries in Region I already authorized to operate on 136 kiloHertz at this moment. We Cuban amateurs are trying to obtain our 136 kiloHertz band before WARC 2003 takes place, and would like to have the 600 meters assignment too !!! My personal experience participating at ITU conferences is that this efforts require great coordination and to be worked well in advance of the actual WARC 2003.... 73 and DX YOur friend in Havana CO2KK ----- Original Message ----- From: "John W Gould" To: "Rsgb_Lf_Group@Blacksheep.Org" Cc: "HF. Chairman List Member" ; "Vk4du@Gmdss. Com. Au" Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:24 AM Subject: LF: IARU Region 1 position on 500kHz > My apologies for not bringing to this group's attention before the outcome > of a discussion of the RSGB paper on 500kHz, at the San Marino Region 1 > Conference. AMRAD have usefully summarised the position with the following > in their Jan-Feb 2003 Newsletter, which I quote with their agreement: > > "G3PSM chaired a working group of ON7ZV, PA0SHY, PA0AWN, ZL2AMJ and G4OUT. > The result was the adoption of Recommendation REC/02/SMC4.11, as follows: > > A Working Group would be formed to investigate the possibility of a > frequency allocation of approximately 10kHz between 470-490kHz to > investigate propagation and the use of new communication technologies. A > progress report should be circulated to the secretaries of Region 2 and > Region 3 for information." > > I would add to that statement a comment to me from Colin, G3PSM on his > return that we should be looking in a post-WRC2003 timeframe to come back > with proposals in relation to this part of the spectrum, thus this is a > long-term issue. > > As IARU Region 1 LF Coordinator I have assumed some responsibility for > forming a "500kHz Working Group" and have approached a few people to lead > such a group. This has been without success, so I put the question to the > LF Group - Can I have volunteers please to work in a group, using e-mail and > a dedicated website, to carry out the task detailed by the above IARU Region > 1 recommendation. Once a group has been formed it can choose its > chairperson. I would like to see an international membership of the Group, > hence the need to conduct business over the Internet. Meeting together > would be expensive and probably difficult to arrange. Volunteers should > e-mail me directly rather than post to the reflector. > > This e-mail has been copied to Colin, G3PSM and also Glenn, VK4DU (for > Region 3). > > 73 John, G3WKL > g3wkl@btinternet.com > > >