Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7498 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2003 02:57:28 -0000 Received: from murphys.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.225) by mailstore with SMTP; 7 Jan 2003 02:57:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 24535 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2003 21:34:10 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 6 Jan 2003 21:34:09 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.12) id 18Veob-00013t-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2003 21:29:45 +0000 Received: from [212.1.130.1] (helo=smtp-1.visp.telinco.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18Veoa-00013k-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2003 21:29:44 +0000 Received: from [80.225.197.18] (helo=RSGB613192) by smtp-1.visp.telinco.net with smtp (Exim 3.32 #1) id 18VecF-00008R-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2003 21:16:59 +0000 Message-ID: <002501c2b5ca$b31defa0$12c5e150@RSGB613192> From: "Andy Talbot" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <3E19A930.8010706@usa.net> <3E19BF5D.3D63E21A@att.net> Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 21:29:24 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: Re: LF: Argo V1 build 132 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=6.0tests=REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT_OEversion=2.43 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Isn't the most logical one YYYY/MM/dd ? Does anyone use this format routinely ? Andy G4JNT ----- Original Message ----- From: Dexter McIntyre To: Cc: Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 5:39 PM Subject: Re: LF: Argo V1 build 132 > Looks great Alberto! > > >>Alberto di Bene wrote: > >> I used this format : MMM, dd, yyyy > > I thought sure you would be the logical dd,MMM,yy type :) > > W4DEX > >