Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31151 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2003 22:49:31 -0000 Received: from netmail01.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.219) by mailstore with SMTP; 8 Jan 2003 22:49:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 24302 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2003 22:49:10 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by netmail01.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 8 Jan 2003 22:49:09 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.12) id 18WOzI-0002Zk-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2003 22:47:52 +0000 Received: from [194.73.73.111] (helo=gadolinium.btinternet.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18WOzH-0002Zb-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2003 22:47:52 +0000 Received: from host217-35-12-143.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([217.35.12.143] helo=dellboy) by gadolinium.btinternet.com with smtp (Exim 3.22 #16) id 18WOzH-00029Z-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 08 Jan 2003 22:47:51 +0000 Message-ID: <001a01c2b768$13b1dae0$1700a8c0@home> From: "Dave Pick" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <29BDD4F529FCD311B631009027357C4E04D6A01C@btss103a.swh.sk> <00d201c2b736$1bdbc5a0$b930fd3e@default> Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 22:48:35 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4920.2300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: Re: LFA 520 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.3 required=6.0tests=QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, USER_AGENT_OEversion=2.43 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false That bloke seems to really like Wellbrook stuff.... Has anyone ever tried one as a 136 receiving antenna? How does it cope with being under a TX antenna on power? Anyone can receive beacons and broadcast stations! ;-) Dave G3YXM > John Wilson did a comparison test in the Nov 2001 Short Wave Magazine > between the RF Systems 520 and the Wellbrook Communications LFL1010 VLF loop > antenna and the 520 was well beaten by the 1010 . > > http://www.wellbrook.uk.com/LFL1010.html > > The SWM review of the 520/1010 and John's savage comments about the 520 can > be found here! :-) > > http://www.wellbrook.uk.com/reviews/SWM2001Nov.html > > 73s Tracey > > > > > > Anybody have experiences with receiving antenna LFA 520 from RF SYSTEMS ? > > > > Rich OM2TW > > > > >