Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11217 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2002 18:18:03 -0000 Received: from marstons.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.223) by mailstore with SMTP; 16 Dec 2002 18:18:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 29718 invoked by uid 10001); 16 Dec 2002 17:17:22 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by marstons.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 16 Dec 2002 17:17:22 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.10) id 18NyrP-0006Qu-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 17:16:55 +0000 Received: from [193.212.240.200] (helo=virus-out.ttyl.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18NyrP-0006Qa-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 17:16:55 +0000 Received: from [134.47.162.90] by virus-in.online.no with ESMTP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 18:16:21 +0100 Received: from tns-fbu-22-215.corp.telenor.no ([134.47.162.192]) by tns-fbu-22-208.corp.telenor.no with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.4453); Mon, 16 Dec 2002 18:16:22 +0100 Received: from tns-fbu-22-212.corp.telenor.no ([134.47.162.91]) by tns-fbu-22-215.corp.telenor.no with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.4453); Mon, 16 Dec 2002 18:16:21 +0100 Received: from TNS-FBU-2E-003.corp.telenor.no ([134.47.164.201]) by tns-fbu-22-212.corp.telenor.no with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.4453); Mon, 16 Dec 2002 18:16:21 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 content-class: urn:content-classes:message Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 18:16:20 +0100 Message-ID: <2D280BB697C7EE4C979C5C89925418EF368FE2@TNS-FBU-2E-003.corp.telenor.no> Thread-Topic: LF: Re: QSO format Thread-Index: AcKlJn6iyTlRaFhPQcSs5waDweQFNwAADSWg From: jan-martin.noding@telenor.com To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Dec 2002 17:16:21.0917 (UTC) FILETIME=[DADECCD0:01C2A526] MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: SV: LF: Re: QSO format Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=5.0tests=NO_REAL_NAME,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01version=2.42 X-Spam-Level: * Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group it depends on your fingers, "tnx" is usually easier to send without wrong letters than TU and TKS for operators like me 73 LA8AK --- J M Nøding, Datakvalitet, Kristiansand (Baneheia) http://tts.telenor.no/orginfo.html?filterstructureid=13&parent=86&treetopid=86 Telefon 380-52660, 9077-7126 -----Opprinnelig melding----- Fra: Fabian Kurz [mailto:fk@diolog.de] Sendt: 16. desember 2002 15:47 Til: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Emne: Re: LF: Re: QSO format > > On a general point about QRSS procedures, I still see 'TNX' or 'TKS' being > sent, 'TU' is much shorter. Also do we need to send the very long '73'? The "TKS" and "73" is sent by W4DEX on 40m; I guess that will be in normal speed and not QRSS ? :) 73, Fabian dj1yfk