Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10958 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2002 18:28:35 -0000 Received: from murphys.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.225) by mailstore with SMTP; 30 Nov 2002 18:28:35 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: (qmail 3179 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2002 18:28:24 -0000 X-Priority: 3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 30 Nov 2002 18:28:24 -0000 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-SQ: A X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.10) id 18ICLO-0002xy-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2002 18:27:58 +0000 Received: from [212.125.75.12] (helo=mail4.messagelabs.com) by post.thorcom.com with smtp (Exim 4.10) id 18ICLN-0002xp-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2002 18:27:58 +0000 X-VirusChecked: Checked X-Env-Sender: William.Ashlock@edwards.boc.com X-Msg-Ref: server-3.tower-4.messagelabs.com!1038680857!14616 Received: (qmail 21771 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2002 18:27:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ukfw1.ge.boc.com) (193.131.2.157) by server-3.tower-4.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 30 Nov 2002 18:27:37 -0000 Received: from z-160-100-160-136.est.ibm.com ([160.100.160.136]) by ukfw1.ge.boc.com; Sat, 30 Nov 2002 18:27:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from exc_wil04.edwards.boc.com ([162.118.144.226]) by exc_cra03.edwards.boc.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id TP3FS500; Sat, 30 Nov 2002 18:31:10 -0000 Received: by EXC_WIL04 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Sat, 30 Nov 2002 13:27:33 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Ashlock,William" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 13:27:25 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Subject: RE: LF: loop antenna + dilemma Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0tests=EXCHANGE_SERVER,INVALID_MSGID,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01version=2.42 Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Loop Enthusiasts, It's ironic that a came back to work during my vacation to gain access to this reflector to report a TX loop problem involving Q and find this Q = 500/D equation being discussed. First here is some hard data for my 50ft X 50ft .62" OD Cu pipe loop 6ft above ground at the lowest point that indicates this equation is way off. Loop Perimeter = 200ft Rac total at 185k (dry soil) = 0.38 ohms Derived Rac for conductor based on skin effect = 0.16 ohms Assumed ground loss (dry soil) = 0.22 ohms Inductance = 95uh Derived Q at 185k (dry soil) = 290 Loop current at 1W (dry soil) = 1.6A Now here's the problem that I need some help on: I built a test loop with an 80ft perimeter from 0.88"OD Cu pipe that can be raised to 25ft (lowest leg) in order to derive a ground loss equation. The calculated Rac for the loop alone, based on skin effect, is 0.05 ohms. The measured Rdc for the loop is 0.015 ohms and the inductance is ~30uh. At 1 foot off the ground the loop Rac measures 0.15 ohms. At any distance greater than 3ft the Rac measures no less than 0.13 ohms!! Thinking that the problem was with the Rac meter (home brewed), I built a test coil comprised of 2mm Litz wound on a 4" form that has a 0.045 ohm Rdc. The coil measures 0.060 ohm on the Rac meter which is close to what I estimated. Therefore, I believe the problem is not in the measurement technique. So the question is: Why can't I get an Rac reading for a loop based on applied voltage and resulting current that is close to the skin effect resistance of the loop conductor?? Here's a list of possibilities: 1. The 16 tin-lead solder joints could have a high Rac at 185k in spite of the Rdc = 0.015 ohms. I suppose I could invest in 80 continuous feet of .75" copper tubing @ ~$100, or braze the joints. I can easily build a loop of the same dimensions from 2mm Litz and see if the results are similar. 2. The surroundings could have an effect. Will move farther from the house (currently 20ft) and note the effect. 3. There could be some theoretical issues I have not taken into account having nothing to with a loop antenna but relating to coil Q, Rac, proximity effect, etc. Other thoughts: There could be 185k E/H radiation (aside from the magnetic field) that is reflected off the lossy ground and back to the loop as an additional Rac loss. The distance to the ground is so small relative to a wavelength that a loop elevation change from 3ft to 25ft would see no Rac change. Thoughts PLEASE. Bill A _____________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by the WorldCom Internet Managed Scanning Service - powered by MessageLabs. For further information visit http://www.worldcom.com