Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20595 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2002 06:34:40 -0000 Received: from marstons.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.223) by mailstore with SMTP; 28 Nov 2002 06:34:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 20268 invoked by uid 10001); 28 Nov 2002 06:34:30 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by marstons.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 28 Nov 2002 06:34:30 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.10) id 18HIEq-0006F0-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 06:33:28 +0000 Received: from [194.73.73.147] (helo=einsteinium) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18HIEp-0006Er-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 06:33:27 +0000 Received: from host213-123-36-112.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([213.123.36.112] helo=dave) by einsteinium with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #16) id 18HIEo-0001ou-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 06:33:27 +0000 From: "Dave Sergeant" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 06:36:08 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <3DE5B958.5738.32FCF@localhost> In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.0.20021125171906.00b9d028@pb623250.kuleuven.be> References: <001d01c29475$f77f6140$0500a8c0@charter.net> X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.02) Content-Description: Mail message body Subject: Re: LF: loop antenna Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.2 required=5.0tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, SPAM_PHRASE_01_02version=2.42 Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group On 25 Nov 2002 at 17:58, Rik Strobbe wrote: > I am about to put up a transmitting loop antenna. Dimensions will be 23m > long and 15m high. Thanks to Dick (PA0SE) I could achieve a wheel of 7mm > litz wire, so wire losses should be minimized (about 0.04 Ohm). I have just done a couple of calculations on Rik's loop using formulae from Mike Underhill G3LHZ (which are quoted on my web site). Mike says that the maximum Q is in fact limited by the size of the loop and has a limiting value of Q=500/D, where D is the diameter of the loop (or for a rectangular loop the circumference divided by pi). Feeding Rik's dimensions into this gives a maximum Q of 20, and it will in practice be lower than this due to resistive losses. This formula has been derived by Mike from actual measurements on loops and while I would vouch nothing for its validity myself, measurements I did on my loop some time ago did indicate it was in the right ball park figure. Reducing dc resistance will not increase the Q above this figure and the astronomic voltages and currents rumoured will not arise. The second formula from Mike is his for loop inductance - it gives a value of 123uH which sounds about right. The third of Mike's formulae on my site is his for radiation resistance. As I have previously found it produces silly values of radiation resistance for 136 loops - in Rik's case of about 2.5 ohms, clearly nonsense. Regarding currents flowing in the loop (and assuming the Q stays within the sensible limits above) measurements on my loop done at the 5W level and scaled indicate a loop current of 26A at 400W. This is probably well in the handling range of Philips 376 polycarbonate capacitors - GW4ALG used this power with his loop with no problems. These capacitors are cheap and worth experimenting with. 73s Dave G3YMC dsergeant@iee.org dsergeant@btinternet.com http://www.dsergeant.btinternet.co.uk