Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9169 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2002 17:36:10 -0000 Received: from marstons.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.223) by mailstore with SMTP; 2 Oct 2002 17:36:10 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 28068 invoked by uid 10001); 2 Oct 2002 18:40:37 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by marstons.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 2 Oct 2002 18:40:37 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.10) id 17wnP9-0004g2-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2002 18:35:23 +0100 Received: from [64.12.136.7] (helo=imo-m04.mx.aol.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17wnP9-0004el-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2002 18:35:23 +0100 Received: from WarmSpgs@aol.com by imo-m04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.13.) id l.ce.2da58c50 (4418) for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 13:34:47 -0400 (EDT) From: WarmSpgs@aol.com Message-ID: Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 13:34:47 EDT To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 120 Subject: Re: LF: Dont open "Larry Kayer" msg VIRUS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0tests=NO_REAL_NAMEversion=2.31 Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group In a message dated 10/2/02 11:47:04 AM Eastern Daylight Time, brian@esoterica.pt writes: << Or is it now possible to generate a completely fictitious communication path header? Alternatively the originator may be in blissfully ignorance? I would be grateful if someone would comment.>> Alas, these are not mutually exclusive. It is possible to generate a largely fictitious header, and it is also possible for the purported originator to be quite unaware that a parasitic bit of software is sending out e-mail under his name. One must be careful to the point of paranoia these days. 73, John