Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20468 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2002 21:32:13 -0000 Received: from marstons.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.223) by mailstore with SMTP; 4 Oct 2002 21:32:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 28106 invoked by uid 10001); 4 Oct 2002 22:36:44 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by marstons.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 4 Oct 2002 22:36:44 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.10) id 17xa2l-0008RL-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2002 22:31:31 +0100 Received: from [216.93.66.203] (helo=mail4.mx.voyager.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17xa2k-0008RB-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2002 22:31:30 +0100 Received: from k6500 (d19.as3.mpls.mn.voyager.net [169.207.249.243] (may be forged)) by mail4.mx.voyager.net (8.11.6/8.10.2) with SMTP id g94LVR468812 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2002 17:31:27 -0400 (EDT) From: "WE0H" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 16:32:36 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 In-reply-to: <000c01c26bc3$ce50ed00$37d0fc3e@l8p8y6> Importance: Normal Subject: LF: RE: SM6BHZ Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0tests=IN_REP_TO,FROM_NAME_NO_SPACES,MAY_BE_FORGED,SUBJ_ALL_CAPSversion=2.31 Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit

LF is booming for us guys in the US. It never let up all summer and there are many new operators building stations lately. This should be a busy winter for the US LF operators.

 

Mike>WE0H

http://www.we0h.us/lf.html

185.3026kc QRSS-30/CW@15wpm

ID is "WE"

 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]On Behalf Of hamilton mal
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 11:33 AM
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: LF: SM6BHZ

 

SM6BHZ calling CQ a short time ago on 136.5 khz RST 599, very strong signal and no one responding. It appears most have lost interest in LF compared to a couple of years ago.

73 khz is never mentioned these days although there is an abundance of operators with NOV'S

at the present time and only one year left for action. 136 khz acty is also very poor and hardly worth the effort. There seems to be a very low up take around EU to engage in 136 in spite of the fact that the band has been going for a number of years.

Listen on 1.8 khz  and up and the bands are more active than ever, it is difficult to find a slot on either CW or SSB plus all the other modes plugging away.

73 de Mal/G3KEV