Return-Path: Received: (qmail 45 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2002 17:41:05 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from murphys.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.225) by mailstore with SMTP; 15 Oct 2002 17:41:05 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 23000 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2002 17:40:19 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 15 Oct 2002 17:40:19 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.10) id 181Vf3-0006rv-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 18:39:17 +0100 Received: from [207.136.80.125] (helo=twiddle.look.ca) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 181Vf2-0006rm-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 18:39:16 +0100 Received: from [216.66.146.91] (helo=bc-van-mut-a53-10-91.look.ca) by twiddle.look.ca with smtp (Exim 4.05) id 181Vex-0005eJ-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 13:39:12 -0400 X-Sender: eldridge@direct.ca X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 1.4.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "Bob Eldridge " Message-ID: Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 13:39:12 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Subject: Re: LF: ARG0 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01version=2.42 Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group >The argo crash info on my screen says: >Fatal error 0E at 0028 : C02987A8 in VXD VWIN32(05) + 000012D0 >I gather some others get the same problems at times, on various PC's. I am sure Alberto will put it right when he gets time. >73 de Mal/G3KEV I had a similar problem, but suspected my computer or my operation of it rather than suspecting the program. I removed garbage files and added some RAM, and the problem, whatever it was, has gone. Has anyone written any operating notes on ARGO? Are there any disadvantages of selecting slow refresh when looking for 120-second dots (which allows less frequent captures)? Bob VE7BS