Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19073 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2002 17:51:39 -0000 Received: from murphys.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.225) by mailstore with SMTP; 9 Oct 2002 17:51:39 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: (qmail 15116 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2002 17:51:51 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 9 Oct 2002 17:51:51 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.10) id 17zKwQ-0007ag-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2002 18:48:14 +0100 Received: from [147.197.200.9] (helo=hestia.herts.ac.uk) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17zKwP-0007aX-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2002 18:48:13 +0100 Received: from gemini ([147.197.200.44] helo=gemini.herts.ac.uk) by hestia.herts.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 17zKva-0006Tn-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2002 18:47:22 +0100 Received: from [147.197.232.252] (helo=rsch-15.herts.ac.uk) by gemini.herts.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 17zKvP-0007KQ-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2002 18:47:11 +0100 Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.0.20021009182934.00af1e68@gemini.herts.ac.uk> X-Sender: mj9ar@gemini.herts.ac.uk X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 18:47:10 +0100 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "James Moritz" In-reply-to: <+N1p07A8CGp9MwyG@telemetry.demon.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MailScanner: No Virus detected Subject: Re: LF: R6BWO & DL1EIE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0tests=DEAR_SOMEBODY,IN_REP_TO,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01version=2.42 Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Dear Tom, LF Group, At 18:00 09/10/2002 +0100, you wrote: >My theory is that the missing dot in Jeff F6BWO's call sign got >mysteriously delayed and re-appeared in that of DL9IE! Both stations >have been very active on 136 for a long time. Now youv'e got me worried - at my QTH DL9IE appears as DJ9IE - a couple more dots getting stretched out in the peculiar perturbations of the ether around Hatfield? What with this, missing dBs, and strange whistling sounds coming into my radio from power lines near Watford... Spooky! Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU