Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17503 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2002 19:52:22 -0000 Received: from marstons.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.223) by mailstore with SMTP; 22 Oct 2002 19:52:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 4891 invoked by uid 10001); 22 Oct 2002 20:56:05 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by marstons.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 22 Oct 2002 20:56:05 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.10) id 18453Q-0000LB-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 20:51:04 +0100 Received: from [210.86.15.146] (helo=mta203-rme.xtra.co.nz) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18453P-0000L2-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 20:51:03 +0100 Received: from mta5-rme.xtra.co.nz ([210.86.15.142]) by mta203-rme.xtra.co.nz with ESMTP id <20021022195029.KFIE3817.mta203-rme.xtra.co.nz@mta5-rme.xtra.co.nz> for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 08:50:29 +1300 Received: from xtr743187 ([219.88.42.205]) by mta5-rme.xtra.co.nz with SMTP id <20021022195028.BGXK18266.mta5-rme.xtra.co.nz@xtr743187> for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 08:50:28 +1300 Message-ID: <002901c27a04$47aa5bc0$cd2a58db@xtr743187> From: "Vernall" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <3DB0C203.A90691A6@verizon.net> <000801c279ad$b339adc0$f530f7c2@a7j7r2> <3DB55E79.50901@usa.net> Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 08:49:39 +1300 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: Type of IF filter Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.3 required=5.0tests=QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, USER_AGENT_OEversion=2.42 Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Hi all, Alberto commented: > IMHO, the main reason for the more pleasant sound is the IF > filter...supposing the '60s receiver > uses a crystal filter, while the Hallicrafters not. > Crystal filters are wonderful in the frequency domain, but terrible > performer in the time domain, > while LC filter just the opposite... My opinion as well. The issue is in "peaks" of group delay for frequencies just inside the edges of the steep roll-off of a filter. Crystal filters have a "squarer" shape factor, hence more peakier group delay (differential phase shift) characteristic. Some professional receivers have "equalising networks" to compensate the group delay over the desired passband. It is a difficult ask to measure group delay of filters, and to explore why the subjective result (by ear) of some filters is less pleasing than from others. It also has implications for data quality of digital modes, and how "equalisation" may be possible. Last weekend I discussed this with a friend who is familiar with PC sound card software, and Windoze operation, and he is confident he can develop an audio frequency response and group delay test set using a full duplex sound card. The basic line-up to investigate is: audio sweep is generated on an output, and the received version is input to the same sound card. The desire is to display graphs of frequency response and group delay, one above the other. This would allow for tweaking of filter tuning in real time, and saving files of results, or hardcopy capture. Such a test set could obviously test audio filters, including DSP filters. It could also deal with radio IF filters by using an SSB transmitter to convert the sweep to RF, and the test receiver in a BFO mode to downconvert to audio, near the original audio frequency. Applying a steady tone at setup may be sufficient for the sound card to find and correct for a frequency offset, as well as find the delay at that frequency (as a reference for sweeping other frequencies). Anyway, that is an outline of a potentially useful tool using a PC sound card. If and when software is developed and proven, I will advise where it could be downloaded from. The above description may also be a challenge for another developer to have a go. 73, Bob ZL2CA