Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25385 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2002 13:55:34 -0000 Received: from murphys.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.225) by mailstore with SMTP; 20 Oct 2002 13:55:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 3647 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2002 13:54:20 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 20 Oct 2002 13:54:20 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.10) id 183GWd-0008Um-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2002 14:53:51 +0100 Received: from [62.253.164.44] (helo=mta4-svc.business.ntl.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 183GWc-0008Ud-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2002 14:53:50 +0100 Received: from l8p8y6 ([62.252.230.0]) by mta4-svc.business.ntl.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with SMTP id <20021020135349.FQHG21311.mta4-svc.business.ntl.com@l8p8y6> for ; Sun, 20 Oct 2002 14:53:49 +0100 Message-ID: <001201c27837$b9fb8c40$61cdfc3e@l8p8y6> From: "hamilton mal" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5.1.0.14.2.20021020084059.00a14b80@mail.pncl.co.uk> <001601c27814$db35a440$106468d5@oemcomputer> Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 11:17:14 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: Re: LF: ICOM 706 Mk2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0tests=DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, SPAM_PHRASE_05_08,USER_AGENT_OEversion=2.42 Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group ----- Original Message ----- From: "mike.dennison" To: Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2002 9:44 AM Subject: Re: LF: ICOM 706 Mk2 > G3JKV wrote: > > I wouldn't advise using the 706 for this purpose even if you get it down > to > > 136. Its local > > oscillator is rather "wobbly" due to the action of its internal fan and > you > > won't find it stable > > enough for narrow-band QRSS etc. I have one and I installed the "hi-stab" > > option which > > made it even worse by introducing a second TCXO-induced wobble. Total > > wobble is only > > at 136 is only a few Hz and doesn't normally matter but it does when > you're > > looking for > > 0.01 Hz! > > My ancient IC-706 Mk1 works absolutely fine receiving 120s QRSS after a few > minutes warm up. On the Mk1, the fan is on permanently - perhaps this is the > fix! I can confirm this. I have seen the XDV signal on QRS and no wobble evident. I also have a 706 late MK1 and have worked various QRS speeds from 1WPM to 60 sec dots and see no wobble or instability. This system was used last year to work across to the USA and Canada on several occassions on 135.922 khz.. It is well within the tolerance required for the above QRS speeds, however if you need 0.00000000001 hz accuracy that might be a different story. A cold outside shed used as a shack during the winter might also blow you off course. Most modern rigs are suitable and stable enough for dividing down from HF freqs, you do not need any special ovens or 200 year old Chinese burnt in and aged xtals. > 73 de Mal/G3KEV > Mike, G3XDV > http://www.lf.thersgb.net > ==================== > > >