Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31173 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2002 07:21:43 -0000 Received: from murphys.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.225) by mailstore with SMTP; 20 Oct 2002 07:21:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 2196 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2002 07:23:08 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 20 Oct 2002 07:23:08 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.10) id 183AO5-0006eM-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2002 08:20:37 +0100 Received: from [212.227.126.186] (helo=moutng.kundenserver.de) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 183AO5-0006eD-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2002 08:20:37 +0100 Received: from [212.227.126.160] (helo=mrelayng0.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 183AO3-0007EN-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2002 09:20:35 +0200 Received: from [62.157.69.64] (helo=W1KW) by mrelayng0.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 183AO3-0003uv-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2002 09:20:35 +0200 Message-ID: <000d01c26dd1$fe11b140$fe78a8c0@W1KW> From: "Holger 'Geri', DK8KW" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <000c01c27787$566bf080$1b6868d5@oemcomputer> Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 09:20:16 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: Re: Re: Ant Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0tests=DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,USER_AGENT_OEversion=2.42 Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Hello >Do not be tempted to droop > the ends of any top wires. ... I challenge that. My umbrella antenna 18m high with 5 pieces of top-load radials sloping downwards (each about 7 m long) works fine (see sketch at http://www.qru.de/station.htm), with an antenna "gain" of roughly - 30 dB. One of the key factors that had increased my ERP was to put up my loading coil 1/3 way up the fiberglas mast so that any losses occuring due to high voltages due to surrounding trees and walls are reduced. Best 73 Geri, DK8KW (W1KW) ----- Original Message ----- From: "mike.dennison" To: Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2002 5:50 PM Subject: LF: Re: Ant Questions > > G0CZD wrote: > > >I'm about to put up a 136kHz Antenna and have a couple of questions. > >I don't have much space in the garden, approx 20m from the apex of the > roof to a 20m high poplar tree in the opposite corner. I am considering > an offset 'T' with a multi-wire top. > >I am assuming (within practical limits) that as much capacitance as > possible in the antenna is beneficial. It will resonate with lower > inductance and therefore lower resistive losses. > > Yes, that is correct. > > >The RSGB LF experimenters h/b (p52) suggests that 2 wires separated by > >100mm will provide 39% increase in capacitance. Is it safe to assume > >that putting multiple wires up at 100mm will provide a compound > >percentage increase? I am considering 6 wires at 100mm separation. Are > >there any better solutions - I have neighbours I wish to remain on > >speaking terms with... > > The capacity hat should be as wide as possible. This is more important that > many wires. In fact, you quickly get into the law of diminshing returns with > extra wires, plus the weight increases much faster than the capacitance. I > use three wires over a total width of 1m. Making it wider would be better > than having extra wires. > > >What effect does height have on the antenna? I can fairly safely get the > >antenna up to 10m above ground level without too much difficulty. Will > >there be any significant benefit to raising the tree end of the antenna > >to say 15m. > > Yes. Height is all important as the ERP is directly related to the =square= > of effective height. Effective height varies from 50% to 100% of the actual > height depending on how good the top section is. Do not be tempted to droop > the ends of any top wires. > > Good luck, Martyn. If you need to see a sketch of my antenna, which is 14m > high by <18m long, it can be found at my web site. > > 73 > > Mike, G3XDV > http://www.lf.thersgb.net > ==================== > > > >