Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3260 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2002 02:02:05 -0000 Received: from marstons.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.223) by mailstore with SMTP; 15 Sep 2002 02:02:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 24103 invoked by uid 10001); 15 Sep 2002 03:06:16 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by marstons.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 15 Sep 2002 03:06:16 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.10) id 17qOhi-0002NY-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 03:00:06 +0100 Received: from [216.93.66.200] (helo=mail1.mx.voyager.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17qOhh-0002NO-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 03:00:05 +0100 Received: from k6500 (d15.as3.mpls.mn.voyager.net [169.207.249.239] (may be forged)) by mail1.mx.voyager.net (8.11.6/8.10.2) with SMTP id g8F203s81711 for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2002 22:00:03 -0400 (EDT) From: "WE0H" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2002 21:00:14 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal In-reply-to: <000c01c25c1c$da716760$78ccfc3e@l8p8y6> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: RE: LF: LF/5 MHZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.3 required=5.0tests=IN_REP_TO,FROM_NAME_NO_SPACES,MAY_BE_FORGED,PORN_11,PORN_3, SUBJ_ALL_CAPSversion=2.31 Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group I would bet that it is perfectly legal to mention your reception in a conversation on an Amateur band. We can talk about anything else, so this wouldn't be different than the everyday conversations we all participate in. Mike>WE0H http://www.we0h.us/lf.html 185.303kc QRSS-30/CW@15wpm ID is "WE" -----Original Message----- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]On Behalf Of hamilton mal Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2002 1:30 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: LF/5 MHZ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stewart Bryant" To: Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2002 2:11 PM Subject: Re: LF: LF/5 MHZ > > > > hamilton mal wrote: > > > > There seems to be a number of LF operators using the new 5 mhz band. Is there anyone in the USA reading this message that can > > transmit on one of the 5 mhz freqs. I have listened a couple of times and so far heard nil from across the water. Please let me > > know. I am on frequently using CW and SSB, but have most modes available. > > The operating standard on CW and associated procedures is of a high standard on 5 mhz. > > 73 de Mal/G3KEV > > > > Although the NoV does not really say anything about who we can > work (other than explicitly including military stations), > the terms of reference on the RSGB web site prohibit cross-band > working with non-NOV holders. > > It is therefore not clear that we are licienced to work US > stations. I wonder if it is also prohibited for a radio amateur or SWL without an NOV to send me a report via EMAIL or to mention to me in another QSO sometime later, on another band that he/she heard me ? Are all others without an NOV not permitted to listen to radio amateurs on the 5 mhz band. I cannot find any reference on my NOV prohibiting xband working, regardless what the RSGB says. I will clarify the position directly with the RA and not use third party interperations. It appears from what this man says that if my signals or anyone else is heard on the 5 mhz band in EU or the USA you are prohibited from telling me on another amateur band. What about 73 and 136 khz xband working with those without a LF NOV ? Has this been illegal all along ? Some questions need to be answered soon. If you hear me and others whispering at rallies and radio clubs you will understand that someone is telling me/them they were heard on 5 MHZ. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 73 de Mal/G3KEV > > Stewart G3YSX >