Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12412 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2002 13:24:58 -0000 Received: from murphys.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.225) by mailstore with SMTP; 9 Aug 2002 13:24:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 27537 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2002 13:24:37 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 9 Aug 2002 13:24:36 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 17dBSg-0003BC-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2002 16:13:58 +0100 Received: from cmsrelay03.mx.net ([165.212.11.112] helo=cmsoutbound.mx.net) by post.thorcom.com with smtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 17dBSe-0003B7-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2002 16:13:57 +0100 Received: from uadvg128.cms.usa.net (HELO cmsoutbound.mx.net) (165.212.11.128) by cmsoutbound.mx.net with SMTP; 9 Aug 2002 13:21:44 -0000 Received: from usa.net [32.97.110.72] by uadvg128.cms.usa.net (ASMTP/dibene@usa.net) via mtad (CM.1201.1.04A) with ESMTP id 533gHiNVY0414M28; Fri, 09 Aug 2002 13:21:50 GMT Message-ID: <3D53C21E.83A9554@usa.net> Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2002 15:22:38 +0200 From: "Alberto di Bene" Organization: None X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: Re: G4JNT and SM6LKM Jason beacons References: <17chZQ-13Oc8eC@fwd05.sul.t-online.com> <5.1.0.14.0.20020808182124.00b0a1b0@gemini.herts.ac.uk> <005701c23f26$3e24c720$162565d5@oemcomputer> <17cwaH-07Lv5UC@fwd11.sul.t-online.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20020809073006.009f6690@mail.pncl.co.uk> <5.1.0.14.0.20020809115706.00a8a048@gemini.herts.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: James Moritz wrote: > [...] > Under these conditions, the IF signal was quite > severely clipped all the time (see the attachment). The audio sounded very > distorted of course. Backing off the RF gain so that little or no clipping > occurred made the signal unreadable by Jason, and almost invisible on a > waterfall display - whilst with the "Jimi Hendrix style" gain settings, the > waterfall was 'O', and Jason could copy perfectly - the difference was very > striking and counter-intuitive. > [...] > This is the opposite to the optimum > setting required for receiving QRSS when there are multiple signals in the > passband; in this case the gain must be reduced until no clipping occurs, > otherwise "blocking" affects the weaker signals. Hmmm, maybe the explanation is that with QRSS the ultimate decoder is the combination eye-brain, which is affected by the amount of visual noise in the waterfall. And, in addition, when computing the waterfall brightness from the magnitude of the received signals, the scale factor of the transformation must be adapted to the mean magnitude, and strong signals tend to dominate, masking weaker ones. With Jason, everything that falls outside the decoding window (the two yellow lines) is plainly discarded. So, if the Jimi Hendrix style of reception has the effect of bringing up the signal, even if this causes severe clipping of noise bursts, the bottom line should be on the positive side. I am fairly sure that the sigma-delta ADCs of the sound cards work in saturation mode and do not wrap around, so increasing the input level is beneficial (up to a point, of course). And, from a software-decoding point of view, the SNR which plays the definitive role is that computed in a bandwidth equal to the FFT bin size. Re Johan beacon, nothing received so far, sorry (but couldn't you turn your dipole E-W ? :-) 73 Alberto I2PHD