Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16949 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2002 15:03:20 -0000 Received: from murphys.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.225) by mailstore with SMTP; 1 Aug 2002 15:03:20 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 3514 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2002 15:03:23 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 1 Aug 2002 15:03:23 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 17aJAN-0005Dr-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2002 17:51:11 +0100 Received: from mrwint.cisco.com ([144.254.98.48] helo=cisco.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 17aJAM-0005Dm-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2002 17:51:10 +0100 Received: from virgin.net (ams-clip-vpn-dhcp113.cisco.com [10.50.0.112]) by cisco.com (8.8.8/2.6/Cisco List Logging/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA25116 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 15:59:10 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <3D494C2A.C0067976@virgin.net> Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 15:56:42 +0100 From: "Stewart Bryant" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en]C-CCK-MCD (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: RE: Re: "Downward modulation" References: <01C2396D.942EAAA0.g4jnt@thersgb.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Do you think that we could get a tour of the station and a lecture on site? Stewart Andy talbot wrote: > Well, I think that solves the problem. Makes sense, and Droitwich is > certainly a 'very high power transmitter'. But a lot has been mentioned over > the last few days about the technology of high power transmitters. Techniques, > I for one, knew nothing about. Would be very interesting if those in the know > could put together some sort of treatise on these. Or an idea for a lecture at > a future LF Meeting. Just a hint ;-) > > I went to take a look at Droitwich a few days ago and noticed something a bit > odd. The Tee top section is not symmetrical. One end seems to have an extra > bit of wire attached to it that the other end does not have. A legacy of the > move from 200 to 198kHz perhaps ? > > Andy G4JNT > > -----Original Message----- > From: Prof. Arnaldo Coro Antich [SMTP:inforhc@ip.etecsa.cu] > Sent: 2002/08/01 12:31 > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: LF: Re: "Downward modulation" > > You are certainly talking about DAM... > Dynamic Amplitude Modulation.... > a process that is used with very high power > transmitters to save energy..... > When there is no modulation, the carrier > level is moved UP, in order to keep the > signal to noise ratio on the channel at > a better level for the listener ( i.e. no background > noise or co-channel stations... you require > 26 dB signal to noise ratio on an AM system > that has between 4 and 5 kiloHertz bandwidth > in order to provide full quieting ...) > AND YES.... there are many high power > AM transmitters nowadays that are facing > very poor operation !!! > 73 and DX > Arnie Coro > CO2KK