Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29815 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2002 09:45:47 -0000 Received: from murphys.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.225) by mailstore with SMTP; 1 Aug 2002 09:45:47 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 5822 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2002 09:45:50 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 1 Aug 2002 09:45:49 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 17aEDA-0004Zl-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2002 12:33:44 +0100 Received: from velli.mail.jippii.net ([195.197.172.114]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 17aED9-0004Zg-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2002 12:33:43 +0100 Received: from meisaku (MKCDXIII.hdyn.saunalahti.fi [195.197.166.213]) by velli.mail.jippii.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 928B118FE5 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 12:42:10 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.20020801124230.00928e50@pop.saunalahti.fi> X-Sender: vaiski1@pop.saunalahti.fi X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 12:42:30 +0300 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?V=E4in=F6_Lehtoranta?= Subject: Re: LF: "Downward modulation" In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.0.20020801100707.00a17630@POP3.freeler.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: I just wonder, why not ask Tony Preedy, G3LNP as the Droitwich system was designed by himself. I have a couple of articles written by him. 73, Vaino, OH2LX To All from PA0SE Apparently my remark that the carrier of Droitwich goes downwards during modulation has caused confusion. I certainly did not mean "downward modulation" as we remember it from our AM transmitter days, an effect caused by insufficient drive, weak power supply or other shortcomings of the transmitter (or the operator...) The carrier of Droitwich and BBC World Service is normal as long as there is a modulating signal. But during moments of no modulation the carrier rises to a higher level. As soon as modulation reappears the carrier returns to its normal level. This can be clearly seen in the attachment to the reflector posting of 31/7 by Jim, M0BMU. I am sure this is done on purpose and not a matter of poor design, bad maintenance or incompetence of the BBC engineers. Dave, G3YXM, in his posting of 30/7 has told us that it is a feature of modern transmitters that can be used to preserve a silent background in the face of interference. I can understand that in connection with the BBC World Service but why it is applied to the 198kHz transmissions escapes me. 73, Dick, PA0SE |---------------------------------------------------------| | V.K.Lehtoranta ¤ 60N33.6 024E58.7 KP20LN74 | | P.O.Box 50 ¤ Telephone: +358-9-4173965 | | FIN-05401, Jokela ¤ Telefax: +358-9-4173961 | | Finland ¤ email: vaiski@dlc.fi | |---------------------------------------------------------|