Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16539 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2002 13:16:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from marstons.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.223) by mailstore with SMTP; 22 Jul 2002 13:16:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 1953 invoked by uid 10001); 22 Jul 2002 13:20:04 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by marstons.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 22 Jul 2002 13:20:03 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 17WcyV-0001Ua-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 14:11:43 +0100 Received: from hestia.herts.ac.uk ([147.197.200.9]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 17WcyU-0001UV-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 14:11:42 +0100 Received: from gemini ([147.197.200.44] helo=gemini.herts.ac.uk) by hestia.herts.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 17WcyT-0002bT-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 14:11:41 +0100 Received: from [147.197.232.252] (helo=rsch-15.herts.ac.uk) by gemini.herts.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 17WcyT-0001q4-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 14:11:41 +0100 Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.0.20020722134910.00adc928@gemini.herts.ac.uk> X-Sender: mj9ar@gemini.herts.ac.uk X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 14:09:57 +0100 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "James Moritz" Subject: LF: Re: LF Roundtable In-reply-to: <3D3BE61A.3B8048D4@virgin.net> References: <3D3BDF8E.17F2CEE1@usa.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Dear LF Group, It was nice to see everyone at the LF round table, and thanks to all the presenters and CARC for an interesting day out. I'm sure the conversation would still be going on if we did not have to go home at some time! Re - computer required for Spectran, I found my old P133/16Mb had problems trying to run Spectran, but various machines around 300MHz seemed to be perfectly OK. The display on the slower computer had a peculiar "blinking" effect, and attempting to save the waterfall to files produced some rather odd-looking results. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU