Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6865 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2002 00:07:32 -0000 Received: from murphys.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.225) by mailstore with SMTP; 18 Jul 2002 00:07:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 399 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2002 00:06:47 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 18 Jul 2002 00:06:47 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 17UykC-0005gY-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 01:02:08 +0100 Received: from www.ietf54.wide.ad.jp ([133.93.192.80] helo=mail.ietf54.wide.ad.jp) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 17UykB-0005gT-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 01:02:07 +0100 Received: from virgin.net (STBRYANT-W2K1.dyn.ietf54.wide.ad.jp [133.93.71.228]) by mail.ietf54.wide.ad.jp (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6I020u16056 for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 09:02:02 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <3D3604F9.8140D550@virgin.net> Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 00:59:53 +0100 From: "Stewart Bryant" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en]C-CCK-MCD (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Re:_LF:_Re:_Activity_from_DLF=C2=B4s_360m_mast?= References: <003001c22c3d$9fbd3680$5f74ccd4@DEFAULT> <5.1.0.14.0.20020716150706.00b88cf8@pb623250.kuleuven.be> <000801c22db8$45e58fa0$74e5fc3e@l8p8y6> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mail.ietf54.wide.ad.jp id g6I020u16056 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: hamilton mal wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rik Strobbe" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 2:21 PM > Subject: Re: LF: Re: Activity from DLF´s 360m mast > > > I don't think it is a matter of impressing someone but just of taking a > > chance to experiment, > > How could you consider this as an experiment, the outcome is obvious, a big > signal from a commercial antenna installation. This is not amateur radio > experimentation on LF. If it gives us another data-point on the antenna size vs ERP curve, it is a valid and worthwhile experiment. Stewart G3YSX