Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25518 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2002 04:18:57 -0000 Received: from marstons.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.223) by mailstore with SMTP; 9 Jul 2002 04:18:57 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 1030 invoked by uid 10001); 9 Jul 2002 04:22:46 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by marstons.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 9 Jul 2002 04:22:46 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 17RmP3-0006nB-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2002 05:15:05 +0100 Received: from siaag2af.compuserve.com ([149.174.40.136]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 17RmP2-0006n6-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 09 Jul 2002 05:15:04 +0100 Received: (from mailgate@localhost) by siaag2af.compuserve.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/SUN-1.12) id AAA23414 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 00:14:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 00:14:08 -0400 From: "'Geri' Kinzel, DK8KW" Subject: LF: Amtor FEC on LF To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-ID: <200207090014_MC3-1-5A1-3D46@compuserve.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Andy, >Isn't AMTOR / RTTY a rather wide and dirty mode to be using on LF ? >170 Hz shift transmitting 100 Baud is at least 300 Hz wide......... ... well, Andy, you are definetely right, AMTOR is by far not an optimum mode for LF, but here in Northern Germany, the LF population density is very low, my next active LF neighbor is over 100 km away, so it does not cause the same trouble you might have in areas such as the U.K. but helps to fill the band at least with some signals .... ;-) 73 Geri, DK8KW (W1KW)