Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17119 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2002 16:28:44 -0000 Received: from marstons.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.223) by mailstore with SMTP; 20 Jul 2002 16:28:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 5917 invoked by uid 10001); 20 Jul 2002 16:32:46 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by marstons.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 20 Jul 2002 16:32:45 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 17Vx24-0005Vz-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sat, 20 Jul 2002 17:24:36 +0100 Received: from mailout02.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.17]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 17Vx23-0005Vu-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 20 Jul 2002 17:24:35 +0100 Received: from fwd06.sul.t-online.de by mailout02.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 17Vx1u-0004f6-04; Sat, 20 Jul 2002 18:24:26 +0200 Received: from (0482183881-0001@[62.224.50.50]) by fwd06.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 17Vx1m-26WSIKC; Sat, 20 Jul 2002 18:24:18 +0200 From: "jannsen" <0482183881-0001@t-online.de> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020720155223.00ae8e80@gemini.herts.ac.uk> Subject: Re: LF: Calculating ERP from measured field strength X-Mailer: T-Online eMail 2.34 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2002 18:24:18 +0200 Message-ID: <17Vx1m-26WSIKC@fwd06.sul.t-online.com> X-Sender: 0482183881-0001@t-dialin.net Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: James Moritz schrieb: > Dear LF Group, > > I'm pleased to see PA0SE's FS measurements agree well with my own - it > looks like we are getting quite good at this now!. I measured my ERP a > couple of weeks ago, after making some slight improvements to my antenna; > it is still an inverted L, but it now has an average height of around 9.5m, > and the same 40m length as before. The 400mW figure was derived from an > average of 11 field strength measurements at distances between about 1.5 > and 3km. Comparing these to measurements I did last year at the same > locations, it is interesting to see that the variations in calculated ERP > between different locations are very consistent - ie. if one location gave > a measurement 1dB above the average last year, it was also 1dB above the > average this year, so whatever causes the variation is stable over quite > long periods of time. All the ERPs were within about 1.5dB of the average > ERP. > > The antenna current of 4.6A is well down on what I get on a cold winter's > day, so I think this antenna should give 500-600mW ERP under good conditions > > I used a "Jason" mode test signal when performing the measurements - this > is ideal for FS measurement, because it is practically a continuous > carrier, and makes it easy to measure the amplitude. > > Cheers, Jim Moritz > 73 de M0BMU > > Hi Jim, you measured field strength at distances between about 1.5 and 3km. did you ever measure at distances >3xlambda, p.e. abt 7km? if you did, did you notice different results caculating the ERP? regards Uwe/dj8wx