Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1193 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2002 16:35:16 -0000 Received: from warrior.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.227) by mailstore with SMTP; 13 Jul 2002 16:35:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 27283 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2002 16:34:24 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 13 Jul 2002 16:34:24 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 17TPkY-0003L7-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 17:28:02 +0100 Received: from mailout01.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.80]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 17TPkX-0003L2-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 17:28:01 +0100 Received: from fwd06.sul.t-online.de by mailout01.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 17TPkU-0001LO-04; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 18:27:58 +0200 Received: from (0482183881-0001@[62.155.252.170]) by fwd06.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 17TPkC-2IagN6C; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 18:27:40 +0200 From: "jannsen" <0482183881-0001@t-online.de> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <01C227EF.24643850.g4jnt@thersgb.net> <5.1.0.14.0.20020710141708.00ba0208@pb623250.kuleuven.be> Subject: Re: LF: polarization of small loops X-Mailer: T-Online eMail 2.34 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 18:27:40 +0200 Message-ID: <17TPkC-2IagN6C@fwd06.sul.t-online.com> X-Sender: 0482183881-0001@t-dialin.net Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Rik Strobbe schrieb: > Dear LF group, > > I have been looking for some information about the polarization of small > loops, but no success. > > For full-size loops things are quite clear, a loop can be polarized > horizontal or vertical depending on the feeding point. > > What about small loops ? > I found several descriptions of small transmitting loops close to ground > and there loops were fed at different places (center horizontal side, at > the edges). Polarization seems to be vertical in all cases. > And what about a small loop is free space ? Current distribution is uniform > over the entire loop, regardless of the feeding point. So one would expect > always the same polarization (but which one ?). Unless also the voltage > distribution plays a role. > > Anyone who can point me to the right theory and/or has experience with > feeding small loops at different points ? > > Thanks in advance, > > Rik ON7YD > > Hi Rik es all, the following may confuse the loop scene still more: I have a loop 70m long, 12m high and 2m above ground with two windings, fed at the lower E (east) edge. some weeks ago I made a field strength test L-aerial (17m mast and 340m longwire 17m to 9m up) contra loop. Geri/DK8KW measured the strength using his MV62. the loop is erected N/E. DK8KW is located S from here. result: no difference btwn the aerials as Geri reported (both 20uV/m). so can one say the (my) loop polarizes vertical (non directional) if used as TX-aerial? vv. used as RX-antennas loop to L-antenna was -63dBu to -50dBu (indicated by a RYCOM-rx) receiving DK8KW. receiving Reino/OH1TN (nearly E) RYCOM indicates no difference btwn the two antennas. but Reino does not hear me if I do use the loop as TX-aerial. with the L-aerial conn to the TX Reino gives me regular RST 569. in abt three weeks I will go to the bottom of it. I will perform tests in QRSS mode during afternoons on 136.0kHz for the purpose of field strength measurements. distance to the aerials: on average seven km (3xlambda). transmitter power output will be 20 Watt, 130 Watt and 800 Watt. Aerials: inv. L-aerial and TX-LOOP. the test will last several weeks. I cant make any schedule. is the qrg ok? any protests from the bandplaners? btw. Rik, in ur fine prgr QRS I do miss the possibility keying a continuous dash among the text. regards dj8wx/Uwe regards Uwe/dj8wx