Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27703 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2002 13:10:24 -0000 Received: from marstons.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.223) by mailstore with SMTP; 11 Jun 2002 13:10:24 -0000 X-MSMail-Priority: High Received: (qmail 13677 invoked by uid 10001); 11 Jun 2002 13:14:19 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by marstons.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 11 Jun 2002 13:14:19 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 17HlMO-0008D2-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 14:06:56 +0100 Received: from smtp-1.visp.telinco.net ([212.1.130.1]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 17HlMN-0008Cx-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 14:06:55 +0100 Received: from [212.1.149.201] (helo=standalone) by smtp-1.visp.telinco.net with smtp (Exim 3.32 #1) id 17Hl13-0004uq-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 13:44:53 +0100 Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 14:04:48 +0100 Message-ID: <01C21150.F2C33350.g4jnt@thersgb.net> From: "Andy talbot" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: RE: LF: DJ Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 14:04:15 +0100 Importance: high X-Priority: 1 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Thought it felt a bit dubious, but I hadn't got the core loss information available so couldn't justify the feeling. Anyway, isn't 2 mix - the red coloured one - the wrong material for this frequency ? I thought that was meant for the 2 - 20 MHz region. The tank coil on my 700W PA, wound with 110 turns of 2.5mm Litz in three layers on a 60mm diameter former just runs warm to touch, so I would guestimate it is dissipating about 10 - 15 Watts and consequently contributing about 0.1dB loss. Possibly about the same loss again in the aluminium case, with three of the surfaces less than a coil's diameter from the tank. The detuning effect of the case proximity caused about 5% reduction in inductance. Before I realised the error of my ways, the first test build of this transmitter had the steel top of the case quite close to the tank coil. This got extremally hot ! Magnetic materials can have very high losses at RF. After several hours of test transmitting the steel was too hot to touch, with all the rest of the PA just comfortably warm. Completely cured by fixing a pure aluminium plate under the steel. A ETD-44 core of 3C85 material forming the output transformer with B max at 0.1T runs at around 50 deg so it looks as if this has the higher loss. Just never got round to making this transformer with a bigger core. Andy G4JNT -----Original Message----- From: James Moritz [SMTP:j.r.moritz@herts.ac.uk] Sent: 2002/06/11 13:07 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: RE: LF: DJ Mal is using the big thick one. The area of this is 2.32cm^2, using Andy's figures, the flux density works out to 50mT or 500 gauss. At 136k this results in core loss of 0.44W/cm^3, and with a volume of 30cm^3 the total core loss is about 13W. The thinner core is about double this. By itself, the 13W will result in a temperature rise of about 50 or so degrees C - the resistive loss in the windings will add at least a few watts and another 20deg C or so to this. By the time you have added some more temperature rise due to being in a box and the insulating effect of the PCB, the actual operating temperature will be way over 100deg C.