Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28223 invoked from network); 13 May 2002 19:37:12 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from unknown (HELO marstons.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.223) by exhibition.plus.net with SMTP; 13 May 2002 19:37:12 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 22337 invoked by uid 10001); 13 May 2002 19:41:04 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (193.82.116.70) by marstons.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 13 May 2002 19:41:04 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 177LZX-00060S-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 13 May 2002 20:33:27 +0100 Received: from mail4.messagelabs.com ([212.125.75.12]) by post.thorcom.com with smtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 177LZW-00060N-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 13 May 2002 20:33:26 +0100 X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 26005 invoked from network); 13 May 2002 19:33:18 -0000 Received: from merimac.us.gases.boc.com (HELO merimac) (204.149.80.4) by server-5.tower-4.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 13 May 2002 19:33:18 -0000 Received: by EXC_WIL04 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 13 May 2002 15:40:58 -0400 Message-ID: From: "Ashlock,William" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: RE: Re: RE: USA/136 Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 15:23:08 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hi Mal, OK on all your comments below. Just by coincidence I'm trying to strip the enamel insulation on this Decca Litz wire and just 5 min ago I ran across a posting by you back in Sept 12 of 2001 on the subject. You indicate that paint stripper worked for your wire but, unfortunately, it doesn't seem to work for me. I'm guessing my problem is the type of stripper I am using. Can you tell me the brand name of the product you used and/or the ingredients listed on the can? Thanks in advance. Bill A -----Original Message----- From: hamilton mal [mailto:g3kev.ham@virgin.net] Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 1:27 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: Re: RE: USA/136 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ashlock,William" To: Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 2:56 PM Subject: LF: RE: USA/136 > Mal, > > Before long two way on LF across the pond will be the norm !! > > 73 de Mal/G3KEV > > Yes, this is great! ...........and we will finally get the opportunity to > show you guys over there how a TX loop burried in the woods can perform; or > burn down the whole forest trying :~) Hello Bill I know you are serious and I will be looking West for smoke, because of the big RF amperage in loops it will possibly happen. I am sticking to the vertical that worked so well last year to the USA and Canada for transmitting but will use both the loop and the vertical for best reception and am arranging a space diversity system for optimum signal. My loop is positioned for optimum results from the East/West. I have some high trees and masts at this QTH and am also hoping to increase the loop size to 180 metre perimiter. The bottom element will be at least 10 feet above ground. Recently I have been using the W & G SPM -12 level meter as a receiver with the 25 hz bandwidth plus a DSP audio filter and it is better than any convential receiver. It is so sensitive with my loop and vertical that I have to throttle it well back. I do not think there is any possibility of missing transatlantic signals given even minimal propogation. Good luck and hope to hear/see some signals soon from across the deep blue. 73 de Mal/G3KEV _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by UUNET delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.uk.uu.net/products/security/virus/