Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12411 invoked from network); 20 May 2002 18:01:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO marstons.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.223) by excalibur-qfe1-smtp-plusnet.harl.plus.net with SMTP; 20 May 2002 18:01:49 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 4292 invoked by uid 10001); 20 May 2002 18:05:45 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (193.82.116.70) by marstons.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 20 May 2002 18:05:45 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 179rRC-0003Jb-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 20 May 2002 18:59:14 +0100 Received: from imo-d06.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.38]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 179rRB-0003JV-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 20 May 2002 18:59:13 +0100 Received: from WarmSpgs@aol.com by imo-d06.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v32.5.) id l.92.2617f910 (30963) for ; Mon, 20 May 2002 13:58:35 -0400 (EDT) From: WarmSpgs@aol.com Message-ID: <92.2617f910.2a1a934b@aol.com> Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 13:58:35 EDT Subject: Re: LF: US FCC NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE MAKING, Comments To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 120 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: In a message dated 5/20/02 8:02:34 AM Eastern Daylight Time, j.r.moritz@herts.ac.uk writes: << Do you think it would be useful to send this type of comment directly to the FCC, or would it be better to do it via AMRAD/LWCA/ARRL etc? >> My personal assessment of the situation is that it would be good to send it directly to the FCC, and to ARRL as well, since they are the organization who filed the petition for rulemaking and are most obliged to support it before the Commission. Comments from amateurs who have been "in the trenches" for a few years, so to speak, will carry some weight with the Commission; and will enable ARRL to better shape their own comments and responses. 73 John