Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10846 invoked from network); 15 May 2002 08:35:32 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from unknown (HELO marstons.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.223) by excalibur-qfe1-smtp-plusnet.harl.plus.net with SMTP; 15 May 2002 08:35:32 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 28675 invoked by uid 10001); 15 May 2002 08:39:26 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (193.82.116.70) by marstons.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 15 May 2002 08:39:26 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 177tzT-0003JK-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 15 May 2002 09:18:31 +0100 Received: from mail2.cc.kuleuven.ac.be ([134.58.10.50]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 177tzS-0003JD-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 15 May 2002 09:18:30 +0100 Received: from LCBD15.fys.kuleuven.ac.be (LCBD15.fys.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.80.15]) by mail2.cc.kuleuven.ac.be (8.12.1/8.12.1) with SMTP id g4F8HwcN038164 for ; Wed, 15 May 2002 10:17:58 +0200 Message-ID: <3.0.1.16.20020515091223.2df7ee54@pb623250.kuleuven.be> X-Sender: pb623250@pb623250.kuleuven.be X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.1 (16) Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 09:12:23 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "Rik Strobbe" Subject: RE: LF: Ground loss In-reply-to: References: <3.0.1.16.20020514131621.08dfed86@pb623250.kuleuven.be> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: >When I derive the formula I assumed wires capacitance 5 pF/meter >If wire is VERY short (0.2 meters) it's not true. For such a short >wire there is about 20 pF/meter. If do some corrections resistance for >ground rode of 0.2 meter is about 3000 Ohm, not 11700 Ohm. >Are You sure real resistance is few hundred Ohm WHEN THERE IS NO LONG >WIRE to connect TX to such a short ground rod? Does You do such >experiment? Hello Alex, I believe there is a misunderstanding, the antenna wire (Lant) remains long (several 10's meter), only the counterpoison (Lcp) is reduced to 0.2m (small ground rod). This creates a larger Lant/Lcp ratio in your formula, resulting in a large R. Few years ago I did some experiments on antenna capacitance / loss resistance depending on the radial system. At the moment I had the radials on the ground (not burried), so I could easily change the radial configuration. At the base of the antenna I had a 30cm ground stake. I noticed that : 1. the antenna capacitance was rather independent from the radial system (180pF with only 30cm ground stake / 200pF with full radial system of in total 80m of wire. 2. the loss resistance varied from 180 Ohm with only groundstake to 80 Ohm with the full radial system. When gradually adding radials I noticed that the first radials made the big change (120 Ohm with 20m radials, 90 Ohm with 40m radials, 80 Ohm with 80m radials). The test antenna at that moment was a 7m high 'umbrella like' antenna (in total 30m wire) kept away from any obstacles as far as possible. Later test showed that a 14m high antenna close to trees had a larger loss resistance of about 110 Ohm (winter) to 140 Ohm (summer) but dispite that it produced a much stronger signal. 73, Rik ON7YD