Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12600 invoked from network); 14 May 2002 09:59:44 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from unknown (HELO warrior.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by excalibur-qfe1-smtp-plusnet.harl.plus.net with SMTP; 14 May 2002 09:59:44 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 6574 invoked from network); 14 May 2002 09:59:34 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (193.82.116.70) by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 14 May 2002 09:59:34 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 177Z28-00082j-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 14 May 2002 10:55:52 +0100 Received: from mail2.cc.kuleuven.ac.be ([134.58.10.50]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 177Z27-00082e-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 14 May 2002 10:55:51 +0100 Received: from LCBD15.fys.kuleuven.ac.be (LCBD15.fys.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.80.15]) by mail2.cc.kuleuven.ac.be (8.12.1/8.12.1) with SMTP id g4E9tJcF102812 for ; Tue, 14 May 2002 11:55:20 +0200 Message-ID: <3.0.1.16.20020514104945.21f7a680@pb623250.kuleuven.be> X-Sender: pb623250@pb623250.kuleuven.be X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.1 (16) Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 10:49:45 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "Rik Strobbe" Subject: RE: LF: Ground loss In-reply-to: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hello Alex, Interesting formula. Assuming that the antenna capcity (C) is linear proportional to the antenna length (Lant) this means that Lant*Xc is a constant. Measurements have shown that the capacitance of an LF antenna is +/- 5pF/m (single wire antenna), so that would make Lant*Xc = 2.34e+5. At 136kHz eps0*w = 7.56e-6, so : a = 7.56e-6/S This would simplify the formula R = (Lant/Lcp)*a*Xc to R = 1.77/(S*Lcp) (at 136kHz) This makes sense as both increasing radial system as increasing ground conductivity will reduce R. I believe the limitations of the formula probably are : 1.The ratio Lant/Lcp should not be too big or small. Increasing Lcp far beyond Lant won't be a great help. On the other hand, even with Lcp = 0 (no cointerpoise wire) the loss resistance will not be endless. 2. S (ground conductivity) should not be too large or too small. If S is too large (eg. salt water) the counterpoise won't be of much use. On the other side even for s = 0 (worst soil you can think of) R won't be endless as the counterpoise will still work. thanks for deriving the formula, 73 Rik ON7YD At 16:17 14/05/02 +0000, you wrote: > >Hi LF Group > >> On Sat, 23 Mar 2002, john sexton wrote: >> If you do find a model that works, please let us know. > > >On the base of my own "generalased mirror reflection theory" I just have >derive the formula for ground loss resistance: > > >R = (lant/lcp)*a*Xc > >where: > >lant - wire length of antenna, >lcp - wire length of ground system (conterpoint), >a = (eps0*w)/s, >eps0 - dielectric constant (8.85e-12 F/m), >w = 6.28*f - circular frequency, >s - ground conductivity. >Xc = 1/(w*C) - antenna reactance, >C - antenna capasitance. > >For 136 kHz and s=1 mSm/m a is about 0.01 > > >The formula is very aproximative but yelds reasonable value of R. > >Now I work on more advanced formula wich should be more accurate. > >Any coments please! > >73 de RA9MB/Alex >http://www.qsl.net/ra9mb > > > >