Message-ID: <002701c1ee0e$362c24a0$19676ec3@cestag>
From: "cesare tagliabue" <cestag@dada.it>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: R: LF: Jason reception
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 19:08:06 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>

        Hi Jim
    Your Jason signals were quite strong and, in the pauses of noise, the
waterfall was completely black and only the lines of signal were clearly
visible, unfortunately the noise, probably due to te 2750 th armonic of the
mains, was walking up and down on the band, from time to time crossing the
frequency and filling the waterfall. The time appearing on screenshot is our
summer  time, UTC+2 hours.  73  Cesare

Cesare Tagliabue   I 5 TGC
WW-Loc  JN53PS
e-mail: cestag@dada.it
url: http://www.dadacasa.com/i5tgc

-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: James Moritz <j.r.moritz@herts.ac.uk>
A: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Data: sabato 27 aprile 2002 17.42
Oggetto: Re: LF: Jason reception


>Dear Marc, Cesare, Alberto, LF Group,
>
>Thanks for the reports and images of the Jason signal last night - I
>transmitted from about 1900 - 2030 utc, with the full 1200W on TX, giving
>about 0.4W ERP.
>
>Later I had a QRSS QSO with IK2DED - conditions were very good at my end,
>and I gave Giulio a 569 report - however he was not able to copy my manual
>CW due to QRN at his end.
>
>I made a few CQ calls this morning around 0845, but apart from someone
>tuning I heard nothing - however, I could see a weak trace on the
>spectrogram at around 136.5kHz which seemed to be CW, drifting about
>+/-10Hz - I don't know if anybody claims this signal, but I think a QRSS
>contact should be quite possible.
>
>Cheers, Jim Moritz
>73 de M0BMU
>
>
>