Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4439 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2002 18:16:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur-qfe1-smtp-plusnet.harl.plus.net with SMTP; 8 Apr 2002 18:16:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 2762 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2002 18:15:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 8 Apr 2002 18:15:54 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16uf4K-0005DY-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 08 Apr 2002 20:44:48 +0100 Received: from mta3.snet.net ([204.60.203.69]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16uf4J-0005DT-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 08 Apr 2002 20:44:47 +0100 Received: from cianciolo (97.79.252.64.snet.net [64.252.79.97]) by mta3.snet.net (8.12.1/8.12.1/SNET-smtp-1.1/D-1.1/O-1.1) with SMTP id g38I4ggo000117; Mon, 8 Apr 2002 14:04:42 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <001201c1df28$728b4420$6e01a8c0@cianciolo> From: "PC" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org, lowfer@mailman.qth.net, "Ashlock,William" References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020408141056.00b0bcd8@gemini.herts.ac.uk> Subject: LF: Ground loss diffferences between loops and verticals Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 14:08:54 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hello Folks, Here in the New England area of the USA there have been a number of experimenters trying loops in the LF band. I have been experimenting with a 200' length(50 feet on a side ) of #24wire 100 pair of telephone cable. A total of 200 wires woven specifically to be minimize crosstalk between pairs and common mode interference. I thought that this may approximate a "Poor Mans Litz Wire". After carefully stripping and solders all the wires, and terminating them into a 1" copper braid, I installed the 60 plus pounds of wire into a diamond shape on my tower. After resonating the loop using silver mica's and measuring the -3db point with a selective voltmeter the antenna had a dismal "Q" of 61 !! Others using similar setups but different conductors have measured "Q" of 180 and above. Also the slope either side of resonance was not smooth at all, there seemed to be peaks among the slope. When looking at the current and voltage waveforms at the feed of the antenna, using the test tool described in the LF handbook, it could be seen that a the current was a perfect sinewave but the voltage waveform always had a flat top or a double peak. Changing resonance or turns on the matching transformer would only changeflat spot slightly. Loop Rac measures 1 Ohm based on matching transformer ratio. Now the loop is on a tower that is 130 feet tall. The guy wires are not broken up with insulators. So is it possible that there is a resonance in the guy wires causing the double peak? /If so why only on the voltage wave forms? This test unit built by W1VD has been used to adjust his antenna and this does not seem to be a problem with his antenna. That was some background, here are my main questions. A) When visualizing the losses from the earth in a vertical antenna system, they would appear to be in series with the Radiation Resistance, thereby limiting the current that thae antenna can draw. Is this statement true? Current flows from the radiator and returns through the earth(limiting the current) which is lossy and thus making a poor radiator. B) How does the earth effect the a loop? Does it look like a lossy secondary of a transformer? Since the loop is "closed" is cannot be truly in series with the antenna. Perhaps the affect is a reflected impedance from the ground causing current to flow in the antenna. In a loop the Rac is determined by the radiation resistance, in series with the loss of the capacitor, in series with the loss in the inductor and an unknown series loss for the earth. Is this true? The antenna I have radiates but not well. Will be experimenting with other conductors and also locating the antenna away from the tower. Please comments Thank you PaulC W1VLF