Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13106 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2002 03:39:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by excalibur-qfe1-smtp-plusnet.harl.plus.net with SMTP; 13 Mar 2002 03:39:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 21245 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2002 03:39:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 13 Mar 2002 03:39:23 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16l13M-0007nR-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2002 05:11:56 +0000 Received: from mail3.mx.voyager.net ([216.93.66.202]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16l13L-0007nM-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2002 05:11:55 +0000 Received: from k6500 (d16.ias0.mpls.mn.pclink.com [206.11.3.215]) by mail3.mx.voyager.net (8.11.6/8.10.2) with SMTP id g2D3Xpe35396 for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2002 22:33:51 -0500 (EST) From: "WE0H" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: RE: loop/update Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 21:34:51 -0600 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 In-reply-to: <3C8E3629.6A23AB12@netscapeonline.co.uk> Importance: Normal Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Good job there, Mal. I am using series tuning on my loop with the remote loop tuner box that I showed you. There is one mod since the picture you seen. Bill told me that wood gets lossy when the moisture goes up, so I remounted all the parts inside on a piece of Plexiglas plastic sheet. I still have to find my ceramic feedthru's around here and will replace the brass screw studs with the ceramic feedthru's. I will insulate the existing studs with Teflon bushings until I find the feedthru's. Keep us posted on your loop experiments. I will post my results when I get operating here. I will soon have pictures of my loop and the remote tuner box on my website for all to see. 73's, Mike>WE0H http://www.geocities.com/we0h/index.html -----Original Message----- From: majordom@post.thorcom.com [mailto:majordom@post.thorcom.com]On Behalf Of gii3kev Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 11:09 AM To: rsgb rsgb Subject: LF: loop/update This particular loop is now hoisted into its final position between 2 high beech trees, a convenient place. Top horizontal totally in the clear, bottom horiz 6 ft above ground, each vertical leg about 10 feet or more clear of tree trunks and branches. Loop is symetrical and rectangular 124 ft horiz x 40 ft vert, area = 4960 sq ft. Inductance measured = 173 uH Resonant F measured = 3065 khz DC resistance of loop wire plus coax feed 1.5 ohms. Loop wire 2.5 mm insulated. Feed 75 ohm coax, about 150 ft long, loop feed point, bottom right hand corner. Loop resonated on 136 khz, parallel configuration 1502 pf needed. Gain measured at receiver without antenna and antenna connected = 30 db approx. Gain difference measured on 136 khz between nonresonated loop and resonated indicates 10 db advantage by resonating. All gain figures relative using LEVEL METER W & G SPM-12. and spectrum analyzer. The spm-12 has an IF output at 10 khz. I built an ext product det/audio stage. Selectivity on this model 1.74 khz, 500 hz and 25 hz, all filters installed. This device makes a fantastic LF receiver. Considering the big signals around on LF there is no evidence of breakthrough. Using resonant hi-Q antennas overcomes a possible problem but as a precaution a front end filter could be useful. This loop now resonant on 136 khz is performing better than I expected on receive, but what it will do on TX could be a different matter. I also have to try and series resonate it and see what happens. Next step is to calculate/measure the loop impedance and make a suitable transformer to match my rx 75 ohm input, but so far even with a mismatch I am suitably impressed. It is now as good as the vertical on receive but bi-directional unfortunately, I suppose I need two of these at right angles to suit all occassions. At present ON6ND, ON4ZK are booming in and G6RO is also about, all calling CQ and it appears they are not hearing each other, maybe they need a LOOP !! 73 de Mal/G3KEV