Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29823 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2002 04:04:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by exhibition.plus.net with SMTP; 4 Mar 2002 04:04:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 837 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2002 04:04:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 4 Mar 2002 04:04:20 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16hl9R-0004kw-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2002 05:36:45 +0000 Received: from mail5.mx.voyager.net ([216.93.66.204]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16hl9P-0004kr-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2002 05:36:43 +0000 Received: from k6500 (d25.ias0.mpls.mn.pclink.com [206.11.3.224]) by mail5.mx.voyager.net (8.11.6/8.10.2) with SMTP id g2440dV01255 for ; Sun, 3 Mar 2002 23:00:39 -0500 (EST) From: "WE0H" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: RE: Re LF: Transmit loops Anyone ??? Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2002 21:59:42 -0600 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Importance: Normal In-reply-to: <96.22a4c935.29b42239@aol.com> Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hi Mike, For our Part-5 experimenters license, there is no antenna limit. That is why I will be putting up a big loop for such use and I already have a legal vertical for Part-15 use. I hope that the FCC will get off their butts and give us the two bands without any antenna limits. Power doesn't matter as the Lowfers have proven. It should be fun to work regular QSO's on LF when it all gets settled upon. The Europeans want to work across the pond more frequently. It will be possible with the antenna restrictions lifted and just a bit more power. 73's, Mike>WE0H http://www.geocities.com/we0h/index.html -----Original Message----- From: majordom@post.thorcom.com [mailto:majordom@post.thorcom.com]On Behalf Of Carmelink@aol.com Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2002 7:05 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re LF: Transmit loops Anyone ??? Hi Mike, For the unlicensed US lowfers, the main barrier to big TX antennas is rather significant: FCC 15.207(b) "The total length of the transmission line, antenna, and ground lead (if used) shall not exceed 15 meters. " Despite the lowfer urban myth, I'm afraid there are no exemptions for huge "non-radiating" horizontal sections in tees and loops, so the 15-meter rule leaves you somewhat limited. Keep rooting for an LF ham band. 73 Mike W2AG