Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5922 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2002 21:08:43 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur-qfe1-smtp-plusnet.harl.plus.net with SMTP; 11 Mar 2002 21:08:43 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 21216 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2002 21:08:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 11 Mar 2002 21:08:43 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16kYVz-0003iL-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 22:43:35 +0000 Received: from mail4.messagelabs.com ([212.125.75.12]) by post.thorcom.com with smtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16kYVy-0003iG-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 22:43:34 +0000 X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 24180 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2002 21:05:30 -0000 Received: from merimac.us.gases.boc.com (HELO merimac) (204.149.80.4) by server-8.tower-4.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 11 Mar 2002 21:05:30 -0000 Received: by EXC_WIL04 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 16:13:18 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Ashlock,William" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: RE: Re: Trees as antenna supports Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 15:56:56 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hi Roy, Don't think a fishing rod would work too well if you were standing in the middle of a forest and had only a small opening in the branches, overhead, to shoot a projectile through. I used to think that placing a loop wire in this situation would be impossible; not now. Bill A PS: I like Tom's suggestion about using orange monofillament line. Hard to see the blue stuff I've been using. Hope it's available in a large spool that allows free-feed off the end. >Here is a far better way to get high above 100 ft or more. I know from >experience, I have several trees as supports. Use a small fishing rod, they >are accurate. And you can get higher than 100 foot or 30 mtrs with this >arrangement ;-) forget about bows and arrows hahahaha. Regards & Best Wishes Roy MM0LOS > Dear LFers > > Just a few more words of advice to the would-be Robin Hoods or Davids > (as in vs. Goliath) amongst us. > > 1) Use a proper lead weight with an eye in it instead of a steel nut. > These are obtainable along with the catapult in any angling shop and are > available in various weights. I use a 6 or 8 ozs one. > > 2) Use the fluorescent orange coloured mono-filament nylon line. Much > easier to see when it is hanging down through the branches. > > 3) If the weight doesn't reach the ground on the other side of the tree, > don't immediately pull it back but ease it back and forth to try and > bring it down. > > 4) If that doesn't work, pull it back SLOWLY. If you do it fast, the > line will wrap itself around a branch and you will never get it down. > Do not pull with all your might as you stand a good chance of injuring > yourself as the weight flies towards you. (I speak from experience!) > > 5) Once you have the mono-filament across the highest point, use it to > pull back some thin cord and then use this to pull across the rope > halyard. Doing it in two stages lessens the risk of breaking the thin > nylon. I use polypropylene for halyards BUT I would think twice about > using polyprop for guying masts as it is attacked by UV and deteriorates > with age. > > > - I've not managed to get a halyard higher than 60 ft with a catapult, > mainly due to the poor elasticity of the synthetic rubber used as > previously noted. Anyone know of a good source of bows and arrows in UK? > > 73, Tom G3OLB > > ********************************************************************* This footnote confirms that this e-mail message has been scanned for the presence of known computer viruses by the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. However, it is still recommended that you use local virus scanning software to monitor for the presence of viruses. ********************************************************************* ********************************************************************* This footnote confirms that this e-mail message has been scanned for the presence of known computer viruses by the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. However, it is still recommended that you use local virus scanning software to monitor for the presence of viruses. *********************************************************************