Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20763 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2002 17:47:25 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from unknown (HELO warrior.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 8 Mar 2002 17:47:25 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 20505 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2002 17:47:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 8 Mar 2002 17:47:22 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16jPro-00036O-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2002 19:17:24 +0000 Received: from mail4.messagelabs.com ([212.125.75.12]) by post.thorcom.com with smtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16jPrn-00036J-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2002 19:17:23 +0000 X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 351 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2002 17:39:19 -0000 Received: from merimac.us.gases.boc.com (HELO merimac) (204.149.80.4) by server-8.tower-4.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 8 Mar 2002 17:39:19 -0000 Received: by EXC_WIL04 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Fri, 8 Mar 2002 12:47:14 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Ashlock,William" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: RE: Re. Loops Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 12:31:02 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hi Laurie, > ......so for tranmitting it would seem to be a good idea to have a bottom wire on, or in the ground. The problem is that the soil losses become fairly large. Think of the loop wire with a huge donut-like AC magnetic field surrounding it. This field doesn't seem to like the composition of the ground, which in effect, adds series resistance to the loop circuit. I find the best compromise in reduction of soil loss Vs maximizing the loop area by keeping the lower conductor at least 5ft above ground. This distance could vary depending on the soil type. The soil here in the Boston area, is composed of at least 60% sand, covered by a thin layer of top soil. >This would have the added advantage of making it possible to use a very thick or multiple thick >wires for this part of the loop thus reducing the total loss resistance by almost 50%, with a >consequent considerable increase in efficiency. You can use multiple paralleled conductors on any portion, or all, of the loop. These conductors must be separated by about and inch to keep the Proximity Effect to a minimum. Forget about twisting these together as you will find almost no reduction in Rac with the added wire. >I can also recomend a bow and arrow for launching wires over trees,although I hav'nt reached 150 feet. Think big! Just a year ago I was in the home-brew bow and arrow, kite string, funk. Was lucky to reach 50 ft and only dreamed of putting a wire over the whole mass of trees. Now, with the $90 (on sale) compound bow, store-bought arrows, and monofillament fishing line, anything is possible (including nailing the neighbors; so be carefull!). Bill A ********************************************************************* This footnote confirms that this e-mail message has been scanned for the presence of known computer viruses by the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. However, it is still recommended that you use local virus scanning software to monitor for the presence of viruses. *********************************************************************