Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15592 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2002 14:39:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by exhibition.plus.net with SMTP; 20 Mar 2002 14:39:54 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 3222 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2002 14:39:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 20 Mar 2002 14:39:49 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16niiq-0005pW-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 16:13:56 +0000 Received: from smtp1.snet.net ([204.60.203.69] helo=mta3.snet.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16niip-0005pR-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 16:13:55 +0000 Received: from snet.net ([64.252.202.155]) by mta3.snet.net (8.12.1/8.12.1/SNET-smtp-1.1/D-1.1/O-1.1) with ESMTP id g2KEYEop019618 for ; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 09:34:15 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C989FE3.EAA99000@snet.net> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 09:42:43 -0500 From: "Jay Rusgrove" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Soundcard Mods References: <7D653C9C42F5D411A27C00508BF8803DCB9A18@pdw-mail-r1.dstl.gov.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Andy I would be interested in your findings on locking the sound card to a master reference. All of the receiving and transmitting stuff here is tied to GPS so the sound card is the weak link in the system. Jay Rusgrove, W1VD Talbot Andrew wrote: > Thanks for all your responses on Soundcard mods. There seem to be so many > variations, the easist way, the route we'll probably follow, is to get a > separate data collection card rather than trying to bodge an S/B. Possibly > the National Instruments one as their products have been used before here. > Unfortunately, it does mean new software will have to be written rather than > being able to call on the old Soundcard stuff......... > > However, will look at my PCI bus true Soundblaster compatible at home and > see how easy it would be to modify for external clock. It would be nice to > be able to lock that to the master reference and have an exact 8000 or 11025 > Hz sampling rate. > > Andy G4JNT > > -- > The Information contained in this E-Mail and any subsequent correspondence > is private and is intended solely for the intended recipient(s). > For those other than the recipient any disclosure, copying, distribution, > or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on such information is > prohibited and may be unlawful.