Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26060 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2002 17:57:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 1 Mar 2002 17:57:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 3911 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2002 17:57:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 1 Mar 2002 17:57:59 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16gsfL-0006Ar-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Fri, 01 Mar 2002 19:26:03 +0000 Received: from ananke4.qdnet.pl ([195.116.13.4]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16gsfJ-0006Am-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 01 Mar 2002 19:26:02 +0000 Received: from tt ([212.244.254.114]) by ananke4.qdnet.pl with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.1600); Fri, 1 Mar 2002 18:46:50 +0100 Message-ID: <000a01c1c148$c740bfc0$1400000a@tt> From: "Richard S Hill" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <200202282155.g1SLt2i12224@db0bm.ampr.org> Subject: LF: RX 136khz Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 18:44:44 +0100 Organization: translations@qdnet.pl MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Mar 2002 17:46:50.0763 (UTC) FILETIME=[11270DB0:01C1C149] Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Now this might seems a silly question. I am thinking about buying the VR 500 yeasu which goes down to 100Khz. Would be it good enough to rx on 136khz as I have seen that you guys are using very low power, computers and various from of CW. What antenna could you suggest for urban use? Ricahrd ex g6gge