Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9577 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2002 18:10:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by exhibition.plus.net with SMTP; 17 Mar 2002 18:10:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 8479 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2002 18:10:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 17 Mar 2002 18:10:09 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16mgUj-0004KV-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Mar 2002 19:39:05 +0000 Received: from mail5.dada.it ([195.110.96.37] helo=mail.dada.it) by post.thorcom.com with smtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16mgUi-0004KQ-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Mar 2002 19:39:04 +0000 Received: (qmail 10648 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2002 18:00:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cestag) (195.110.102.21) by mail.dada.it with SMTP; 17 Mar 2002 18:00:53 -0000 Message-ID: <000401c1cddd$8fa4e720$15666ec3@cestag> From: "cesare tagliabue" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: R: Loop Conductors and proximity effect Rdc Rac Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 18:58:12 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hello Paul Following the Mesny's expression for proximity effect we have: D/d q 1 3.5 1.5 2.48 2 2 3 1.5 4 1.28 5 1.19 6 1.12 7 1.07 8 1.03 =>9 1 Where D is the distance between centre of wires, d is the diameter of the wire and q is a factor to be inserted in the following expression: Reff / Rrf = 1 + (q - 1) * SQR (( p - 1 ) / p ) Where Rrf is the RF resistance of a single wire and p is = Rrf / Rdc Reff is the effective resistance due to proximity effect and Rdc is the d.c. resistance of the wire. Hope that will help you, 73 Cesare Cesare Tagliabue I 5 TGC WW-Loc JN53PS e-mail: cestag@dada.it url: http://www.dadacasa.com/i5tgc -----Messaggio originale----- Da: Paul A. Cianciolo A: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org ; Lowfer@mailman.Qth.Net Data: domenica 17 marzo 2002 17.13 Oggetto: LF: Loop Conductors and proximity effect Rdc Rac >Hello Folks > >After researching the construction of Litz wire (Thanks John Sexton, Bill A >and many others) and speaking to a few wire manufactures, I feel I >understand better the complex weaving that is needed to make Rac of this >wire close to the Rdc. > >A loop using single turn of 100 pair telephone cable was in the planning >stages. > >So now after opening up a few types of telephone, 100 pairs/#24 and 25 >pairs/24 cat 5 wire, >none of these are designed with the same weaving as the litz wire. They are >designed for low crosstalk between conductors and >immunity to outside interference. > >So here is the question.... The proximity effect! > >Where can I acquire data about the distance needed between conductors to >avoid this effect? > >For instance.. I have lots of Belden 9555 which is dual RG59 LAN cable. >>From a 1000' roll >I could acquire 10 200' runs that could be spaced at some distance and put >in parallel. > >This would bring the Rdc of the loop down to .052 Ohm's. I need to get an >idea if the spacing of these 10 conductors >would need to be 1", 5" 10" or more to disregard the proximity effect and >have a very low Rac. > >anyone have any thoughts > > > > >Paulc >W1VLF > > >This Email was brought to you by a completely solar powered home network. > >Cloudbounce Webpage http://www.qsl.net/w1vlf/ >GE Electrak E20 and E15 electric tractors >Air Rifle Target Shooting Enthusiast > > > > >