Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17070 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2002 23:07:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 15 Mar 2002 23:07:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 24441 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2002 23:07:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 15 Mar 2002 23:07:37 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16m2Bz-000866-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Mar 2002 00:37:03 +0000 Received: from carbon.btinternet.com ([194.73.73.92]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16m2By-000861-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Mar 2002 00:37:03 +0000 Received: from host62-7-33-151.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([62.7.33.151] helo=default) by carbon.btinternet.com with smtp (Exim 3.22 #8) id 16m0f5-0004pI-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 22:59:00 +0000 Message-ID: <000101c1cc74$fa9620e0$9721073e@default> From: "Alan Melia" To: "LF-Group" Subject: LF: Loop and inverted L aerials Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 22:24:28 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hi all, this is an interesting discussion.....I don't how pertinent this is but I have been trying a few 'rear of envelope' calculations. Using Dave G3YMCs figures for dynamic resistance and and assuming it increases linearly with increasing loop periphery, I worked out the efficency of several loop sizes. Then I calculated the efficiency of an L, which could be errected in the same space (2 sides of the loop), assuming a ground loss of about 60 ohms. The crossover point came with a loop of about 110m by 10m, assuming only a 10m height. I calculate that as the radiation resistance increases rapidly with height in vertical , Mal would probably have to put up 30m by 90m loop to compare with his vertical (which I calculate at about 0.6 ohms Rrad) This is rather over-simplified as it does not allow for the reduction in loss resistance as the L increases in length I will put the formula into a EXCEL spread-sheet and make it available on my web site http://www.alan.melia.btinternet.co.uk look in the useful programs (?) area One area where the loop might help is in 'static' conditions. The loop will receive the EM waves from lightning flashes but it should not collect the local voltages that a vertical does. There has been quite a bit done with QRP in Eupope and 1w to an average aerial does not get you very far on hand keyed morse, particularly in daytime. G6RO has used a 5 watt rig quite a lot as did Steve GW4ALG before he left the band. Their best DX was about 300 miles with a following wind. Geri DK8KW could also relate the experiences of the German stations who were limited to 20w output. Cheers de Alan G3NYK alan.melia@btinternet.com