Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17763 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2002 22:51:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by exhibition.plus.net with SMTP; 17 Feb 2002 22:51:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 19368 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2002 22:51:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 17 Feb 2002 22:51:45 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16cbdd-000245-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2002 00:26:37 +0000 Received: from chalfont.mail.uk.easynet.net ([212.135.1.67]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16cbdb-00023x-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2002 00:26:35 +0000 Received: from erica (tnt-1-98.easynet.co.uk [195.40.206.98]) by chalfont.mail.uk.easynet.net (Postfix) with SMTP id C0D4C1D4F90 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2002 22:48:33 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <002a01c1b805$d30d5c60$bbca28c3@erica> From: "g3ldo" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <001a01c19a31$655db6c0$466152d5@it> <001901c1b3fc$a9ee9400$05e9fea9@g3aqc> <000f01c1b49a$fd9ef1a0$e36968d5@oemcomputer> <3C6B3000.E70FBDC3@att.net> Subject: LF: Re: Vertical grounded tower for LF antenna. Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 22:49:04 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Dexter > > Not long after performing this adjustment I received an email with > screen capture asking me if I knew what that signal was in the TA > window. The time and frequency confirmed it was my signal. This > reception report came from a station 543 KM away at mid day with the > generator power of 0 dbm! I knew this arrangement worked fairly well > for receive but to find it would radiate so well was a surprise. I > thought most of the signal would be shunted to ground since the > radiating wire was so close to the tower. I had a look at your antenna mast - quite impressive. When we started out on LF most of our antenna thinking was conditioned by commercial designs. After a while it became apparent that the shape of the antenna didn't matter; an electrically small antenna has the same polar diagram no matter what shape you make it. Your successful test illustrates this point. Most antenna losses appear to be caused by ground resistance. > > Now my question to the few who have read this far. Can I expect this to > be a good high power transmitting LF antenna with the addition of a good > coil? All cables from the tower route down to about half a meter above > ground where they run horizontal under the shack floor. I suspect these > cables would be hot with RF unless they are choked off by some method. The coupling with the LF/HF antenna and the mast is small because the wire is near at right angles to the mast and anyway doesn't carry much current. As for coupling into other feeders I haven't found this a problem. My LF transmitter is located at the bottom of the garden and feeder cables for RF and remote control run parallel to the antenna which has an average height of 35ft. Try the antenna on transmit and only resort to remedial actions if they prove necessary. The LF coil shown on your website is excellent for transmitting with the sort of power that amateurs are allowed to use; a very good design if I may say so. You will need a good long ceramic insulator to isolate the antenna wire from the mast to cope with the high voltage and the Canadian winters. When can we expect to hear (see) you on? Regards, Peter, G3LDO e-mail Web