Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12384 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2002 18:22:23 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by exhibition.plus.net with SMTP; 17 Jan 2002 18:22:23 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 1534 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2002 18:22:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 17 Jan 2002 18:22:04 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16RH93-0002HW-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 18:20:13 +0000 Received: from hestia.herts.ac.uk ([147.197.200.9]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16RH92-0002HR-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 18:20:12 +0000 Received: from gemini ([147.197.200.44] helo=gemini.herts.ac.uk) by hestia.herts.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 16RH8G-0004jp-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 18:19:24 +0000 Received: from [147.197.232.252] (helo=rsch-15.herts.ac.uk) by gemini.herts.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 16RH8F-0006do-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 18:19:23 +0000 Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.0.20020117180313.00a86760@gemini.herts.ac.uk> X-Sender: mj9ar@gemini.herts.ac.uk X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 18:18:03 +0000 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "James Moritz" Subject: Re: LF: Jason Wednesday evening... In-reply-to: <3C470F16.655A1E10@usa.net> References: <3.0.5.32.20020116200443.0099d780@pop3.esoterica.pt> <001d01c19ecc$f4471260$1700a8c0@home> <5.1.0.14.0.20020117112637.00a99b98@gemini.herts.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: At 18:51 17/01/2002 +0100, you wrote: >Hi Jim, > I have been unable to reproduce this behaviour... even if changing center >frequency while transmitting, everytime it worked ok. Of course the new >frequency is used at the next tone time, but no problems as far as the dialog >box is concerned. You talk about Task Manager, so you must be using >either Win NT or Win 2000. I tested Jason both with Win98 and Win 2000, >not with NT. Could be this the culprit ? >Anybody else observed such phenomenon ? > >73 Alberto I2PHD Dear Alberto, I tried it on this PC at work (Windows 2000), and my laptop (Win 98), with identical results. I can't remember what the win98 version of task manager is called, but there is something which performs a similar function. But I tried it again just now (at work), and it worked perfectly! Hmmm - I'll try it again when I get home, but it looks like it must just have been "finger trouble" on my part - sorry for getting you going! Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU