Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6332 invoked from network); 1 Jan 2002 10:50:54 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from unknown (HELO warrior.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 1 Jan 2002 10:50:54 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 5522 invoked from network); 1 Jan 2002 10:50:53 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 1 Jan 2002 10:50:53 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16LMTj-00021g-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 01 Jan 2002 10:49:07 +0000 Received: from mail-5.tiscalinet.it ([195.130.225.151] helo=mail.tiscalinet.it) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16LMTi-00021b-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 01 Jan 2002 10:49:06 +0000 Received: from ath650.tiscalinet.it (62.10.42.189) by mail.tiscalinet.it (5.5.053) id 3C067F2A00D1B6D5 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 1 Jan 2002 11:47:48 +0100 Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.0.20020101114249.01df2650@pop.tiscalinet.it> X-Sender: spin.elec@pop.tiscalinet.it X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2002 11:47:45 +0100 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: "Marco Bruno IK1ODO" Subject: LF: GPS-based Frequency Standard MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hi all, Dexter W4DEX asked about frequency standards on the LOWFER reflector. I presume that the subject may be of interest also there in times of very narrow band communications. The question was: >Is there anyone on this list who is familiar with Brooks Shera's >GPS-based Frequency Standard project which was published in QST, July >98? Info can also be found at: > >http://www.rt66.com/~shera/ The Brooks Shera's project is very good, but not inexpensive. For best results you need a Motorola UT+ GPS receiver. I bought it new three years ago for about $200 including the antenna. The PCB and components cost about $100, then you need a stable OCXO. I use a surplus unit by Oscilloquartz, coming from an Omega receiver. The best choice for cost vs. quality is an HP 10811A, contained in many instruments, of wich the more common is the 5328A-H99 universal counter, available probably around $150. Sometimes it contains the 10544A oscillator; if possible look for the 10811A, it has better stability, less noise and less power drain. If you have to buy all the parts you spend about $450. The project is not very complex, but you have to understand operation and tweek with time constants and receiver settings, then monitor it for some week to verify performance. From the point of view of a standard frequency aficionado (as I am...) it is VERY interesting. For general purpose use it is quite complex to manage; but when it works you forget it. Other possibilities are: 1) the HP 10811A alone. An excellent oscillator, and you may expect some parts in 10^-8 per year from a good unit operated continuously. But keep a spare unit... I've seen some of them "die" of quartz inactivity. And you must have access to a primary standard for tuning and checking it. 2) a Rubidium standard. A cheap one is worth $200-250 (check Ebay). You get probably some parts in 10^10/year from an Efratom M100, but again you need a way of checking it (need a Cesium!) 3) a Cesium standard. Now, it's a primary one!. Absolutely not suggested to the average amateur, since the initial cost may be low (some $2000 or $3000), but the tube has short life and it is VEEERY expensive. 4) an HP Z3801A. An embedded GPS standard frequency receiver like the Brooks Shera project, but simpler to use and already boxed! You add power, a PC and a GPS antenna, and get 10 MHz. Performance very close to the Brooks Shera project, cost about $450 on Ebay, varying availability. I have one working at the QRL, and I am happy about it. I use it to check the long term stability of our Cs and Rb, and it is a good performer. If you need more info, let me know. 73 ES HNY - Marco IK1ODO