Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23385 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2002 13:11:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur-qfe1-smtp-plusnet.harl.plus.net with SMTP; 23 Jan 2002 13:11:42 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 27882 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2002 13:11:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 23 Jan 2002 13:11:46 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16TN6w-0000yu-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 13:06:42 +0000 Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.101]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16TN6v-0000yo-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 13:06:41 +0000 Received: from northrelay01.pok.ibm.com (northrelay01.pok.ibm.com [9.117.200.21]) by e1.ny.us.ibm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA362328 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 08:02:18 -0500 Received: from usa.net (ss6.bld.socks.ibm.com [9.14.4.71]) by northrelay01.pok.ibm.com (8.11.1m3/NCO v5.01) with ESMTP id g0ND5Ii148330 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2002 08:05:19 -0500 Message-ID: <3C4EB4FB.49E9E931@usa.net> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 14:04:59 +0100 From: "Alberto di Bene" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: RE: Freedom... References: <7D653C9C42F5D411A27C00508BF8803DCB9971@pdw-mail-r1.dstl.gov.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Talbot Andrew wrote: > The first URL seems to require getting a Yahoo ID and entering a lot of > information I'm not preparred to give - is this necessary ? > > The second URL seems a lot easier - just asking for an EMail address. I have already an Yahoo ID and tried to post to that group. Unfortunately the post was rejected, being it in HTML (it contained a small captured image). It is a vexata quaestio (latin for debated problem) whether HTML posts should be allowed or not in discussion groups. My personal opinion is yes, but I can understand the position of the nay-sayers. There is not an easy answer... 73 Alberto I2PHD