Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19966 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2002 10:16:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by excalibur-qfe1-smtp-plusnet.harl.plus.net with SMTP; 17 Jan 2002 10:16:49 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 26418 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2002 10:16:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 17 Jan 2002 10:16:47 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16R9U3-00015o-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 10:09:23 +0000 Received: from d06lmsgate.uk.ibm.com ([195.212.29.1]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16R9U2-00015d-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 10:09:22 +0000 Received: from d06relay01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.166.84.147]) by d06lmsgate.uk.ibm.COM (1.0.0) with ESMTP id JAA13272 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 09:46:00 GMT Received: from usa.net (ss9.bld.socks.ibm.com [9.14.4.75]) by d06relay01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.11.1m3/NCO v5.01) with ESMTP id g0HA7M185996 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 10:07:22 GMT Message-ID: <3C46A266.17645993@usa.net> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 11:07:34 +0100 From: "Alberto di Bene" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: Re: Jason repeats characters References: <200201160949_MC3-EE22-1A6B@compuserve.com> <3C459E5F.23959E4C@usa.net> <008f01c19edb$284c4cc0$f70c97d4@oemcomputer> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Johan Bodin wrote: > I have noticed that when the transmission stops and Jason is exposed > to noise, he (it?) usually repeats the last transmitted character. > Judging from the waterfall, Dave transmitted only a single K at the end of > his transmission but I got five K's on the screen! Statistically, that shouldn't > have happened unless Jason has some kind of unintentional "memory"...? > > Maybe LF noise isn't random chaos after all... :-) > Dear Johan, yes, that's what I have observed too. I would like to beleive in your last sentence, thinking that in the chaos there are some 'strange attractors' :-) but more realistically I think to have found in the decoding logic what could explain that. During this coming weekend I will change the signalling format to use the 17-slot method, and will do also some tests for the above. Thanks for the report. 73 Alberto I2PHD