Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28347 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2002 15:31:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 16 Jan 2002 15:31:32 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 21784 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2002 15:31:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 16 Jan 2002 15:31:35 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16QrwB-000796-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 15:25:15 +0000 Received: from d06lmsgate-4.uk.ibm.com ([195.212.29.4]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16QrwB-000791-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 15:25:15 +0000 Received: from d06relay02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.166.84.148]) by d06lmsgate-4.uk.ibm.COM (1.0.0) with ESMTP id PAA116836 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 15:11:03 GMT Received: from usa.net (ss01.raleigh.ibm.com [9.37.3.89]) by d06relay02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.11.1m3/NCO v5.01) with ESMTP id g0GFLcF129462 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 15:21:38 GMT Message-ID: <3C459AED.ADB809B9@usa.net> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 16:23:25 +0100 From: "Alberto di Bene" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: Re: G3YXM's Jason test sigs References: <200201160949_MC3-EE22-1A6B@compuserve.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: "Holger 'Geri' Kinzel, DK8KW" wrote: > ... if the system would be depending on the sideband, could it be > internally switched from "normal" to "reverse" (I mean at a later version, > not the test version of course)? In this case I believe it would make sense > to save bandwidth and go for this algorithm. Geri, yes, but you have been beaten by Johan Bodin :-):-) 73 Alberto I2PHD