Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4554 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2002 22:48:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 2 Jan 2002 22:48:58 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 1662 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2002 22:48:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 2 Jan 2002 22:48:56 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16Lu0u-0007jl-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2002 22:37:36 +0000 Received: from d12lmsgate-3.de.ibm.com ([195.212.91.201]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16Lu0t-0007jg-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2002 22:37:35 +0000 Received: from d12relay02.de.ibm.com (d12relay02.de.ibm.com [9.165.215.23]) by d12lmsgate-3.de.ibm.com (1.0.0) with ESMTP id XAA13074 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 23:36:17 +0100 Received: from usa.net (ss5.bld.socks.ibm.com [9.14.4.70]) by d12relay02.de.ibm.com (8.11.1m3/NCO v5.01) with ESMTP id g02Maml151230 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 23:37:01 +0100 Message-ID: <3C3389E2.74420952@usa.net> Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2002 23:29:54 +0100 From: "Alberto di Bene" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: Re: Xmas tests References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020102150917.00a4aa88@gemini.herts.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: James Moritz wrote: > [...] > Most of the problem with frequencies seems to be due to the 3 1/2 Hz > bandwidth that Argo has when used in 60s dot mode, which is a bit > restrictive. > [...] Argo, in the sake of maximum resolution, uses rigidly one screen pixel for each FFT bin. That's why with QRSS60 the span shown is only 3.5 Hz. I could resample spatially the waterfall to have more Hz displayed, but I am not sure it is a good idea, resolution-wise... 73 Alberto I2PHD