Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21455 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2002 08:43:42 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received: from unknown (HELO warrior.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by excalibur-qfe1-smtp-plusnet.harl.plus.net with SMTP; 30 Jan 2002 08:43:42 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 8260 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2002 08:43:43 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 30 Jan 2002 08:43:43 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16VqEm-0004Yr-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 08:37:00 +0000 Received: from ns3.swh.sk ([192.108.125.37]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16VqEk-0004Ym-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 08:36:59 +0000 Received: from hermes.swh.sk (hermes.swh.sk [192.108.125.60]) by ns3.swh.sk (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g0U8a2712589 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 09:36:02 +0100 Received: from btss101a.swh.sk (btss.swh.sk [139.24.136.15]) by hermes.swh.sk (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id JAA09000 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 09:35:53 +0100 (MET) Received: by btss.swh.sk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 09:35:50 +0100 Message-ID: <29BDD4F529FCD311B631009027357C4E0333C1CD@btss103a.swh.sk> From: "Gasparik Richard" To: "Rsgb_Lf_Group \(E-mail\)" Subject: LF: Good propagations...? Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 09:35:47 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hi LF-ers... Info by Lee KH6BZF, well knowing expert for the conditions forecast....between 30.1. and 2.2.2002 will be extremely good propagations on 160m. It sounds good. Maybe the coherence between 160m and LF propagations is possible. 73 de Rich OM2TW