Return-Path: Received: (qmail 767 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2002 15:06:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur-qfe1-smtp-plusnet.harl.plus.net with SMTP; 16 Jan 2002 15:06:40 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 16325 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2002 15:06:38 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 16 Jan 2002 15:06:38 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16QrPO-00072U-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 14:51:22 +0000 Received: from siaag1ab.compuserve.com ([149.174.40.4]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16QrPN-00072P-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 14:51:21 +0000 Received: (from mailgate@localhost) by siaag1ab.compuserve.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/SUN-1.12) id JAA13406 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:49:59 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:49:34 -0500 From: "Holger 'Geri' Kinzel, DK8KW" Subject: LF: Re: G3YXM's Jason test sigs To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-ID: <200201160949_MC3-EE22-1A6B@compuserve.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Alberto, >So, what would all you judge more important, sideband independence, >or bandwidth used ? Your vote will decide the final format for Jason. ... if the system would be depending on the sideband, could it be internally switched from "normal" to "reverse" (I mean at a later version, not the test version of course)? In this case I believe it would make sense to save bandwidth and go for this algorithm. Best 73 Geri, DK8KW (W1KW)