Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7050 invoked from network); 1 Jan 2002 21:49:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 1 Jan 2002 21:49:39 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Received: (qmail 17969 invoked from network); 1 Jan 2002 21:49:38 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 1 Jan 2002 21:49:38 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16LWkO-0003Xk-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 01 Jan 2002 21:47:00 +0000 Received: from imo-r02.mx.aol.com ([152.163.225.98]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16LWkN-0003Xf-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 01 Jan 2002 21:46:59 +0000 Received: from MarkusVester@aol.com by imo-r02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.9.) id l.13c.717b816 (18252) for ; Tue, 1 Jan 2002 16:46:09 -0500 (EST) From: MarkusVester@aol.com Message-ID: <13c.717b816.29638821@aol.com> Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 16:46:09 EST Subject: LF: Very slow DFCW To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: AOL 4.0.i for Windows 95 sub 72 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hi all, tonight I'd like to try SpecLab's limits in generating extremely slow DFCW: 300 s dashes + 100 s spaces, frequency shift 25 mHz. I'll be on 135922.275 /.300 Hz (if it's free) starting at 21:45, one callsign will take abt 2.5 hours. I wonder if there is any benefit of using symbol durations longer than the typical fading timescale. 73 de Markus, DF6NM