Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29190 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2002 23:34:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by exhibition.plus.net with SMTP; 22 Jan 2002 23:34:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 11418 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2002 23:34:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 22 Jan 2002 23:34:27 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16TANj-0007XH-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 23:31:11 +0000 Received: from latimer.mail.uk.easynet.net ([195.40.1.40]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16TANi-0007XC-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 23:31:11 +0000 Received: from erica (tnt-1-74.easynet.co.uk [195.40.206.74]) by latimer.mail.uk.easynet.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 26D0053E8B for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 23:30:20 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <000401c1a39d$4d1fb0c0$4ace28c3@erica> From: "g3ldo" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020120184653.00a411b0@mail.pncl.co.uk> <5.1.0.14.0.20020121134048.00aa7958@gemini.herts.ac.uk> <3C4D7524.F7D8A146@netscapeonline.co.uk> Subject: LF: Re: For the record Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 23:33:24 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: > This power measuring game could throw up some surprises !!!!! especially with so > many JEEPS about !! Bang goes my New Year's resolution. I did say that I would never get involved in this awful KEV stuff that is polluting our reflector, but feel that I must say something. Otherwise you get the situation (as history shows) where if a lie is told often enough it becomes the 'truth'. Real truth is worth defending. As regards transmitted power, as we are all aware (except for one) ERP is a function of transmitted power and antenna size - the larger the antenna the less power is required to reach the 1w ERP level. For a suburban sized antenna you need a transmitter power greater than 1kW and several high power transmitters were built. Two of these, one by G3KAU and the other by G3YXM are shown in "The Low Frequency Experimenter's Handbook" pages 12 and 40. An interesting design was shown in the "LF Experimenter's Source Book" (forerunner of LFEH) by G3LNP which ran 4kV to the anode of a QYS-3000 to produce 3kW O/P. He had calculated he needed that sort of power to get 1w ERP from a simple vertical antenna. By making the Decca transmitters available, G3JKV made a valuable contribution to the LF community by showing us commercial design techniques, such as the PA bridge configuration, tank circuit design and guard circuit that were subsequently incorporated into the G4JNT high power transmitter. I use a Decca transmitter but find it difficult to hit 1w ERP level. The antenna is shown on page 57 of LFEH and has a calculated gain of -24dB1. With 6.5amps I get a calculated 1.49w into the radiation resistance of the antenna. However environmental effects such as trees reduce this by about a half, which gives an ERP of around 800mW. This sort of power is only achieved when the weather is relatively dry. G3KEV's antenna has been described many times but the power and the antenna current have not. The antenna is described as: "The antenna I have been using for the recent Transatlantic QSO'S consists of 4 inverted L's supported by a lattice tower at 105 ft high. Each L is 105 ft vertical and each one has a horizontal top section of 300 ft. The 4 vertical bottom ends converge to a common feed point 4 ft above ground, connected to about 400 micro henry loading coil and has a small series coil to ground used for resonating and fine tuning to get a 1:1 SWR. Ground Radials consist of several 300 ft insulated wires, some connected at the far end to sheep fencing. All the wire for antennas and radials is 2.5 mm insulated. The 4 inv L's are spaced at 90 degrees from each other around the tower." This antenna has a calculated gain (assuming good ground) of -16.6dBi. I am not sure what transmitter is being used but a couple of years ago it was 400w. If this were connected to the antenna it would result in antenna current of 3.5A and a calculated 3.8w into the radiation resistance of the antenna. However if there are tall trees around the site this could reduce it to around 2w ERP. G3KEV has recently discovered transatlantic QSOs using QRSS: "Solid fast QRS qso with VE1ZJ at 2 sec dot, almost there on normal CW. The xband QSO only took a few minutes 136/7025 kHz solid copy both ways. I understand previous QSO's took hours and days to complete." The only QSO that I am aware of that took place over days was the 136kHz 2 way between G3AQC and VA3LK. My QSOs, according to the log are as follows: 29/9/00 VE1ZJ on 14.043kHz, G3LDO on QRSS3, QSO time around 20mins 13/2/01 VE1ZZ on QRSS3, G3LDO on QRSS10, 136kHz 2 way. (VE3ZJ receiver link via 80m) QSO time 50mins 21/2/01 VE1ZZ on QRSS3 136kHz G3LDO on 3512kHz QSO time 15mins. I am not getting involved in this stuff any more - I will go and join the silent majority. Regards, Peter, G3LDO e-mail Web